Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Dec 1;10(1):20895.
doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-77715-6.

Analyzing the effects of memory biases and mood disorders on social performance

Nanda Kishore Sreenivas  1 , Shrisha Rao  2
Affiliations

Analyzing the effects of memory biases and mood disorders on social performance

Nanda Kishore Sreenivas et al. Sci Rep. .

Abstract

Realistic models of decision-making and social interactions, considering the nature of memory and biases, continue to be an area of immense interest. Emotion and mood are a couple of key factors that play a major role in decisions, nature of social interactions, size of the social network, and the level of engagement. Most of the prior work in this direction focused on a single trait, behavior, or bias. However, this work builds an integrated model that considers multiple traits such as loneliness, the drive to interact, the memory, and mood biases in an agent. The agent system comprises of rational, manic, depressed, and bipolar agents. The system is modeled with an interconnected network, and the size of the personal network of each agent is based on its nature. We consider a game of iterated interactions where an agent cooperates based on its past experiences with the other agent. Through simulation, the effects of various biases and comparative performances of agent types is analyzed. Taking the performance of rational agents as the baseline, manic agents do much better, and depressed agents do much worse. The payoffs also exhibit an almost-linear relationship with the extent of mania. It is also observed that agents with stronger memory perform better than those with weaker memory. For rational agents, there is no significant difference between agents with a positive bias and those with a negative bias. Positive bias is linked with higher payoffs in manic and bipolar agents. In depressed agents, negative bias is linked with higher payoffs. In manic agents, an intermediate value of mood dependence offers the highest payoff. But the opposite is seen in depressed agents. In bipolar agents, agents with weak mood dependence perform the best.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Mood dependence.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Results.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Effect of levels of mania and depression.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Schelling TC. Micromotives and Macrobehavior. Leicestershire: Norton; 1978.
    1. Epstein JM, Axtell R. Growing artificial societies: Social science from the bottom up. Cambridge: MIT Press; 1996.
    1. Harding EJ, Paul ES, Mendl M. Cognitive bias and affective state. Nature. 2004;427:312. doi: 10.1038/427312a. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Burman OH, Parker RM, Paul ES, Mendl MT. Anxiety-induced cognitive bias in non-human animals. Physiol. Behav. 2009;98:345–350. doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2009.06.012. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Sreenivas, N. K. & Rao, S. Egocentric bias and doubt in cognitive agents. In Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and MultiAgent Systems, AAMAS ’19, 286–295 (International Foundation for Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, 2019).