Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Nov 11:7:573692.
doi: 10.3389/fvets.2020.573692. eCollection 2020.

Genomic Prediction of Additive and Dominant Effects on Wool and Blood Traits in Alpine Merino Sheep

Affiliations

Genomic Prediction of Additive and Dominant Effects on Wool and Blood Traits in Alpine Merino Sheep

Shaohua Zhu et al. Front Vet Sci. .

Abstract

Dominant genetic effects may provide a critical contribution to the total genetic variation of quantitative and complex traits. However, investigations of genome-wide markers to study the genomic prediction (GP) and genetic mechanisms of complex traits generally ignore dominant genetic effects. The increasing availability of genomic datasets and the potential benefits of the inclusion of non-additive genetic effects in GP have recently renewed attention to incorporation of these effects in genomic prediction models. In the present study, data from 498 genotyped Alpine Merino sheep were adopted to estimate the additive and dominant genetic effects of 9 wool and blood traits via two linear models: (1) an additive effect model (MAG) and (2) a model that included both additive and dominant genetic effects (MADG). Moreover, a method of 5-fold cross validation was used to evaluate the capability of GP in the two different models. The results of variance component estimates for each trait suggested that for fleece extension rate (73%), red blood cell count (28%), and hematocrit (25%), a large component of phenotypic variation was explained by dominant genetic effects. The results of cross validation demonstrated that the MADG model, comprising additive and dominant genetic effects, did not display an apparent advantage over the MAG model that included only additive genetic effects, i.e., the model that included dominant genetic effects did not improve the capability for prediction of the genomic model. Consequently, inclusion of dominant effects in the GP model may not be beneficial for wool and blood traits in the population of Alpine Merino sheep.

Keywords: Alpine Merino sheep; additive effects; dominant effects; genomic prediction; prediction accuracy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Prediction accuracies of 9 traits using the two models. Different colors represent different models. Abbreviations of traits are explained in Table 2.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Jacobs A, Elmer KR. Alternative splicing and gene expression play contrasting roles in the parallel phenotypic evolution of a salmonid fish. bioRxiv [Preprint]. (2020). bioRxiv:2020.2005.2011.087973. 10.1101/2020.05.11.087973 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Goddard M. Genomic selection: prediction of accuracy and maximisation of long term response. Genetica. (2008) 136:245–57. 10.1007/s10709-008-9308-0 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Meuwissen THE, Hayes BJB, Goddard MEM. Prediction of total genetic value using genome-wide dense marker maps. Genetics. (2001) 157:1819–29. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Wiggans GR, Cole J, Hubbard S, Sonstegard T. Genomic selection in dairy cattle: the USDA experience. Annu Rev Anim Biosci. (2016) 5:309–27. 10.1146/annurev-animal-021815-111422 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Miglior F, Fleming A, Malchiodi F, Brito L, Martin P, Baes C. A 100-year review: identification and genetic selection of economically important traits in dairy cattle. J Dairy Sci. (2017) 100:10251–71. 10.3168/jds.2017-12968 - DOI - PubMed