Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Feb;21(1):105-118.
doi: 10.3758/s13415-020-00851-z. Epub 2020 Dec 2.

Executive functioning moderates neural reward processing in youth

Affiliations

Executive functioning moderates neural reward processing in youth

Maria Kryza-Lacombe et al. Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2021 Feb.

Abstract

Although executive functioning has traditionally been studied in "cool" settings removed from emotional contexts, it is highly relevant in "hot" emotionally salient settings such as reward processing. Furthermore, brain structures related to "cool" executive functioning and "hot" reward-related processes develop simultaneously, yet little is known about how executive functioning modulates neural processes related to reward processing during adolescence, a period of time when these systems are still developing. The present study examined how performance on "cool" behavioral executive functioning measures moderates neural reward processing. Youths (N = 43, Mage = 13.74 years, SD = 1.81 years) completed a child-friendly monetary incentive delay task during fMRI acquisition that captures neural responses to reward anticipation and to reward receipt and omission. Performance on inhibitory control and cognitive flexibility measures, captured outside the scanner, was used to predict brain activation and seed-based connectivity (ventral striatum and amygdala). Across analyses, we found that executive functioning moderated youths' neural responses during both reward anticipation and performance feedback, predominantly with respect to amygdala connectivity with prefrontal/frontal and temporal structures, supporting previous theoretical models of brain development during adolescence. Overall, youths with worse executive functioning had more pronounced differences in neural activation and connectivity between task conditions compared with youths with better executive functioning. This study contributes to elucidating the relationship between "cool" and "hot" processes and our findings demonstrate that simple executive functioning skills moderate more complex processes that involve incorporation of numerous skills in an emotionally salient context, such as reward processing.

Keywords: Adolescents; Children; Executive functioning; Reward processing; fMRI.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Disclosures: The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.. Executive functioning moderates reward-related brain activation.
Graphs display predicted brain activation values for indicated clusters based on best and worst executive functioning standard scores in the present sample (low=75, high=112.5), controlling for age. For corresponding scatterplots that do not account for age see Supplemental Figure S4. Brain images of additional clusters are displayed in Supplemental Figure S6. Brain images represent axial sections (left=left) with threshold set at whole-brain FDR-corrected p<.05.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.. Executive functioning moderates reward-related brain connectivity.
Graphs display predicted brain connectivity values for indicated clusters based on best and worst executive functioning standard scores in the present sample (low=75, high=112.5), controlling for age. For corresponding scatterplots that do not account for age see Supplemental Figure S5. Brain images of additional clusters are displayed in Supplemental Figure S6. Brain images represent axial sections (left=left) with threshold set at whole-brain FDR-corrected p<.05.

References

    1. Angold A, & Costello E. (1987). Mood and feelings questionnaire (MFQ). Durham, NC: Developmental Epidemiology Program, Duke University.
    1. Bandelow B, & Michaelis S. (2015). Epidemiology of anxiety disorders in the 21st century. Dialogues Clin Neurosci, 17(3), 327–335. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Beck DM, Schaefer C, Pang K, & Carlson SM (2011). Executive Function in Preschool Children: Test-Retest Reliability. J Cogn Dev, 12(2), 169–193. doi:10.1080/15248372.2011.563485 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Benson BE, Guyer AE, Nelson EE, Pine DS, & Ernst M. (2015). Role of contingency in striatal response to incentive in adolescents with anxiety. Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci, 15(1), 155–168. doi:10.3758/s13415-014-0307-6 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Birmaher B, Khetarpal S, Brent D, Cully M, Balach L, Kaufman J, & Neer SM (1997). The Screen for Child Anxiety Related Emotional Disorders (SCARED): Scale construction and psychometric characteristics. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 36(4), 545–553. - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources