Letter Regarding Editorial by Samuel Zagarella
- PMID: 33264129
- DOI: 10.1097/DAD.0000000000001857
Letter Regarding Editorial by Samuel Zagarella
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Comment in
-
In Response.Am J Dermatopathol. 2021 Jul 1;43(7):541-542. doi: 10.1097/DAD.0000000000001828. Am J Dermatopathol. 2021. PMID: 33055538 No abstract available.
Comment on
-
Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy Still Provides No Benefits for Patients With Melanoma.Am J Dermatopathol. 2020 Jul;42(7):481-483. doi: 10.1097/DAD.0000000000001656. Am J Dermatopathol. 2020. PMID: 32310861 No abstract available.
References
-
- Zagarella S. Sentinel lymph node biopsy still provides No benefits for patients with melanoma. Am J Dermatopathol. 2020;42:481–483.
-
- Pournamdari AB, Tkachenko E, Barbieri J, et al. A state-of-the-art review highlighting medical overuse in dermatology, 2017-2018: a systematic review. JAMA Dermatol. 2019.
-
- Mitra A, Conway C, Walker C, et al. Melanoma sentinel node biopsy and prediction models for relapse and overall survival. Br J Cancer. 2010;103:1229–1236.
-
- Freeman SR, Gibbs BB, Brodland DG, et al. Prognostic value of sentinel lymph node biopsy compared with that of Breslow thickness: implications for informed consent in patients with invasive melanoma. Dermatol Surg. 2013;39:1800–1812.
-
- Karakousis GC, Gimotty PA, Czerniecki BJ, et al. Regional nodal metastatic disease is the strongest predictor of survival in patients with thin vertical growth phase melanomas: a case for SLN Staging biopsy in these patients. Ann Surg Oncol. 2007;14:1596–1603.
Publication types
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
