Endoscopic polypectomy performed in clinic for chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps: study protocol for the EPIC multicentre randomised controlled trial
- PMID: 33268434
- PMCID: PMC7713191
- DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-042413
Endoscopic polypectomy performed in clinic for chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps: study protocol for the EPIC multicentre randomised controlled trial
Abstract
Introduction: Chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) is common, with a Canadian prevalence of 5%, and associated with significant morbidity. Understandably, CRS impairs workplace productivity but that productivity substantially increases following surgical treatment. CRS with nasal polyps (CRSwNP), the most common type of CRS, is usually treated with a combination of medications and endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS). Historically, surgical treatment has only been performed in the operating room at a cost of about $C3500. However, recent studies have shown that a de-escalated procedure, endoscopic polypectomy performed in clinic (EPIC), can provide an improvement in patient symptoms to levels equal to those for ESS. Moreover, EPIC has additional proposed advantages including shorter recovery time, significantly lower cost to the healthcare system and shorter wait time for the patient. There is currently insufficient evidence to draw conclusions about the superiority of polypectomy or ESS for the management of CRSwNP.
Methods and analysis: We designed a multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial to evaluate whether EPIC was non-inferior to the current clinical standard, ESS for the treatment of CRSwNP. The primary outcome is the Sinonasal Outcome Test-22 score measured at baseline and at 3 months after surgery. Other outcomes include peak nasal inspiratory flow, quality of life measured by the EuroQoL 5 Dimensions 5 Levels questionnaire and work impairment using the Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Questionnaire.We aim to recruit 140 patients from sites across Canada. Participants will be randomly assigned to EPIC or ESS and followed up for 3 months in clinic after the procedure. Additionally, participants will enter a 5-year long-term follow-up period.
Ethics and dissemination: This study was approved by the Ottawa Health Sciences Network Research Ethics Board for all sites in Ontario, Canada (study number CTO0801). Sites located outside of Ontario obtained approval from their local/institutional research ethics board.
Trial registration number: NCT02975310.
Keywords: adult otolaryngology; endoscopic surgery; health economics.
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Conflict of interest statement
Competing interests: None declared.
Similar articles
-
Case-control study of endoscopic polypectomy in clinic (EPIC) versus endoscopic sinus surgery for chronic rhinosinusitis with polyps.Rhinology. 2018 Jun 1;56(2):155-157. doi: 10.4193/Rhin17.115. Rhinology. 2018. PMID: 29306958
-
Endoscopic polypectomy in the clinic: a pilot cost-effectiveness analysis.Clin Otolaryngol. 2016 Apr;41(2):110-7. doi: 10.1111/coa.12473. Epub 2016 Feb 4. Clin Otolaryngol. 2016. PMID: 26053107
-
Endoscopic sinus surgery in adult patients with chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (PolypESS): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.Trials. 2017 Jan 23;18(1):39. doi: 10.1186/s13063-016-1728-z. Trials. 2017. PMID: 28114954 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Surgical versus medical interventions in CRS and nasal polyps: comparative evidence between medical and surgical efficacy.Curr Allergy Asthma Rep. 2015 Nov;15(11):66. doi: 10.1007/s11882-015-0566-5. Curr Allergy Asthma Rep. 2015. PMID: 26411803 Review.
-
Systematic literature review of humanistic and economic burdens of chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyposis.Curr Med Res Opin. 2020 Nov;36(11):1913-1926. doi: 10.1080/03007995.2020.1815683. Epub 2020 Sep 25. Curr Med Res Opin. 2020. PMID: 32851882
Cited by
-
Assessing the safety and tolerability of rhinologic surgery under local anesthetic: an 8-year retrospective analysis.Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2024 Sep;281(9):4845-4853. doi: 10.1007/s00405-024-08655-4. Epub 2024 Apr 23. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2024. PMID: 38652299
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
Associated data
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical