Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021 May;50(5):429-434.
doi: 10.1111/jop.13147. Epub 2021 Jan 11.

Follow-up after oral cancer treatment-Transition to a personalized approach

Marieke Brands  1   2   3 , André Verbeek  4 , Sandra Geurts  5 , Thijs Merkx  1   3
Affiliations
Review

Follow-up after oral cancer treatment-Transition to a personalized approach

Marieke Brands et al. J Oral Pathol Med. 2021 May.

Abstract

Background: Guidelines for follow-up after oral cancer treatment are not site-specific and encompass the entire head and neck area rather than the oral cavity alone. This one-size-fits-all protocol disregards the differences in aetiology, treatment and differential distribution of new disease between the subsites. With the effectiveness of follow-up in early detection of new disease being put into question, the focus of follow-up programmes might shift to other aspects of survivorship care. Personalization of follow-up is important, considering patient-specific features and needs. Furthermore, the COVID-19 pandemic urges us to rethink our follow-up practice.

Findings: This paper discusses ways in which routine follow-up in patients treated for oral cancer can be optimized. Patients with a high risk of new disease might benefit from an intensified follow-up regimen, whilst patients with a low risk of new disease, a low chance of cure or limited life expectancy could benefit from a de-intensified follow-up regimen. The latter could include a shorter follow-up period and focus on goals other than early detection of new disease. Education of patients to report new symptoms early is of vital importance as the majority of new disease presents symptomatically. Other health care professionals such as specialist nurses and dentists need to play an important leading role in survivorship care. Remote consultations may be useful to perform more efficient and patient-centred follow-up care.

Conclusion: Routine follow-up needs to be seen as an integrated part of an individualized survivorship plan that is provided by the entire multidisciplinary team.

Keywords: Oral cancer; routine follow-up; second primary tumour; surveillance; survivorship care.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

REFERENCES

    1. Crawford B, Greenberg DD. Introduction to Cancer Surveillance Strategies. In: Johnson FE, ed. Patient Surveillance After Cancer Treatment. New York, Heidelberg, Dordrecht, London: Humana/Springer; 2013:9-14.
    1. Health Council of the Netherlands. Follow-up in oncology. Identify objectives, substantiate actions. The Hague: Health Council of the Netherlands; 2007.
    1. Brands MT, Brennan PA, Verbeek ALM, Merkx MAW, Geurts SME. Follow-up after curative treatment for oral squamous cell carcinoma. A critical appraisal of the guidelines and a review of the literature. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2018;44(5):559-565.
    1. Morris LG, Sikora AG, Patel SG, Hayes RB, Ganly I. Second primary cancers after an index head and neck cancer: subsite-specific trends in the era of human papillomavirus-associated oropharyngeal cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29(6):739-746.
    1. De Zoysa N, Lee A, Joshi A, et al. Developing a follow-up surveillance protocol in head and neck oncological surgery: enhanced 'traffic light' surveillance - a prospective feasibility study. Clin Otolaryngol. 2017;42(2):446-450.

LinkOut - more resources