Triage process for the assessment of coronavirus disease 2019-positive patients with cancer: The ONCOVID prospective study
- PMID: 33270908
- PMCID: PMC7753308
- DOI: 10.1002/cncr.33366
Triage process for the assessment of coronavirus disease 2019-positive patients with cancer: The ONCOVID prospective study
Abstract
Background: Patients with cancer are considered at high risk for the novel respiratory illness coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). General measures to keep COVID-19-free cancer divisions have been adopted worldwide. The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of triage to identify COVID-19 among patients with cancer.
Methods: From March 20 to April 17, 2020, data were collected from patients who were treated or followed at the authors' institution in a prospective clinical trial. The primary endpoint was to estimate the cumulative incidence of COVID-19-positive patients who were identified using a triage process through the aid of medical and patient questionnaires. Based on a diagnostic algorithm, patients with suspect symptoms underwent an infectious disease specialist's evaluation and a COVID-19 swab. Serologic tests were proposed for patients who had symptoms or altered laboratory tests that did not fall into the diagnostic algorithm but were suspicious for COVID-19.
Results: Overall, 562 patients were enrolled. Six patients (1%) were diagnosed with COVID-19, of whom 4 (67%) had the disease detected through telehealth triage, and 2 patients (33%) without suspect symptoms at triage had the disease detected later. Seventy-one patients (13%) had suspect symptoms and/or altered laboratory tests that were not included in the diagnostic algorithm and, of these, 47 patients (73%) underwent testing for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 antibody: 6 (13%) were positive for IgG (n = 5) or for both IgM and IgG (n = 1), and antibody tests were negative in the remaining 41 patients.
Conclusions: The triage process had a positive effect on the detection of COVID-19 in patients with cancer. Telehealth triage was helpful in detecting suspect patients and to keep a COVID-19-free cancer center. The overall incidence of COVID-19 diagnosis (1%) and antibody positivity (13%) in patients with suspect symptoms was similar to that observed in the general population.
Keywords: COVID-19 antibody; COVID-19 infection; coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2); triage.
© 2020 American Cancer Society.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors made no disclosures.
Figures



Similar articles
-
Feasibility and Predictive Performance of a Triage System for Patients with Cancer During the COVID-19 Pandemic.Oncologist. 2021 Apr;26(4):e694-e703. doi: 10.1002/onco.13706. Epub 2021 Feb 19. Oncologist. 2021. PMID: 33539583 Free PMC article.
-
Optimising triage procedures for patients with cancer needing active anticancer treatment in the COVID-19 era.ESMO Open. 2020 Sep;5(5):e000885. doi: 10.1136/esmoopen-2020-000885. ESMO Open. 2020. PMID: 32958531 Free PMC article.
-
Unexpected high frequency of unspecific reactivities by testing pre-epidemic blood specimens from Europe and Africa with SARS-CoV-2 IgG-IgM antibody rapid tests points to IgM as the Achilles heel.J Med Virol. 2021 Apr;93(4):2196-2203. doi: 10.1002/jmv.26628. Epub 2020 Nov 22. J Med Virol. 2021. PMID: 33107601
-
Seropositivity rate and diagnostic accuracy of serological tests in 2019-nCoV cases: a pooled analysis of individual studies.Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2020 Oct;24(19):10208-10218. doi: 10.26355/eurrev_202010_23243. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2020. PMID: 33090430 Review.
-
Clinical applications of detecting IgG, IgM or IgA antibody for the diagnosis of COVID-19: A meta-analysis and systematic review.Int J Infect Dis. 2021 Mar;104:415-422. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2021.01.016. Epub 2021 Jan 12. Int J Infect Dis. 2021. PMID: 33450372 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Accurate Triage of Oncological Patients for Safely Continuing Cancer Therapy During the SARS-CoV-2 Pandemic.Front Oncol. 2021 Oct 14;11:707346. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.707346. eCollection 2021. Front Oncol. 2021. PMID: 34722252 Free PMC article.
-
Detection of SARS-CoV-2 infection prevalence in 860 cancer patients with a combined screening procedure including triage, molecular nasopharyngeal swabs and rapid serological test. A report from the first epidemic wave.PLoS One. 2022 Feb 2;17(2):e0262784. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0262784. eCollection 2022. PLoS One. 2022. PMID: 35108300 Free PMC article.
-
Management of patients with cancer during the COVID-19 pandemic: The Italian perspective on the second wave.Eur J Cancer. 2021 May;148:112-116. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2021.01.040. Epub 2021 Feb 25. Eur J Cancer. 2021. PMID: 33743478 Free PMC article.
-
Characteristics and patterns of care of endometrial cancer before and during COVID-19 pandemic.J Gynecol Oncol. 2022 Jan;33(1):e10. doi: 10.3802/jgo.2022.33.e10. Epub 2021 Nov 12. J Gynecol Oncol. 2022. PMID: 34910391 Free PMC article.
-
Anti-inflammatory or anti-SARS-CoV-2 ingredients in Huashi Baidu Decoction and their corresponding targets: Target screening and molecular docking study.Arab J Chem. 2023 May;16(5):104663. doi: 10.1016/j.arabjc.2023.104663. Epub 2023 Feb 15. Arab J Chem. 2023. PMID: 36816510 Free PMC article.
References
-
- World Health Organization (WHO) . Coronavirus disease (COVID‐19) pandemic, update: June 25, 2020. WHO; 2020. Accessed August 27, 2020. https://www.who.int/emergencies/diseases/novel‐coronavirus‐2019