Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Dec 3;21(1):250.
doi: 10.1186/s12875-020-01315-6.

A qualitative exploration of two risk calculators using video-recorded NHS health check consultations

Victoria Riley  1 , Naomi J Ellis  2 , Lisa Cowap  2 , Sarah Grogan  3 , Elizabeth Cottrell  4 , Diane Crone  5 , Ruth Chambers  6 , David Clark-Carter  2 , Sophia Fedorowicz  2 , Christopher Gidlow  2
Affiliations

A qualitative exploration of two risk calculators using video-recorded NHS health check consultations

Victoria Riley et al. BMC Fam Pract. .

Abstract

Background: The aim of the study was to explore practitioner-patient interactions and patient responses when using QRISK®2 or JBS3 cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk calculators. Data were from video-recorded NHS Health Check (NHSHC) consultations captured as part of the UK RIsk COmmunication (RICO) study; a qualitative study of video-recorded NHSHC consultations from 12 general practices in the West Midlands, UK. Participants were those eligible for NHSHC based on national criteria (40-74 years old, no existing diagnoses for cardiovascular-related conditions, not on statins), and practitioners, who delivered the NHSHC.

Method: NHSHCs were video-recorded. One hundred twenty-eight consultations were transcribed and analysed using deductive thematic analysis and coded using a template based around Protection Motivation Theory.

Results: Key themes used to frame the analysis were Cognitive Appraisal (Threat Appraisal, and Coping Appraisal), and Coping Modes (Adaptive, and Maladaptive). Analysis showed little evidence of CVD risk communication, particularly in consultations using QRISK®2. Practitioners often missed opportunities to check patient understanding and encourage risk- reducing behaviour, regardless of the risk calculator used resulting in practitioner verbal dominance. JBS3 appeared to better promote opportunities to initiate risk-factor discussion, and Heart Age and visual representation of risk were more easily understood and impactful than 10-year percentage risk. However, a lack of effective CVD risk discussion in both risk calculator groups increased the likelihood of a maladaptive coping response.

Conclusions: The analysis demonstrates the importance of effective, shared practitioner-patient discussion to enable adaptive coping responses to CVD risk information, and highlights a need for effective and evidence-based practitioner training.

Trial registration: ISRCTN ISRCTN10443908 . Registered 7th February 2017.

Keywords: Cardiovascular disease; Chronic disease prevention; NHS health check; Risk communication.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Protection Motivation Theory model adapted to proposed study context [38]
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Public Health England. Health matters: preventing cardiovascular disease. Gov.uk. 2019 Available from: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/health-matters-preventing-car.... [cited 2020 Mar 29].
    1. Department of Health . Putting prevention first. NHS Health Check: vascular risk assessment and management best practice guidance. London: Department of Health; 2009.
    1. Public Health England. NHS Health Check: Best practice guidance. PHE Publ. 2017;3:1–76. Available from: https://www.healthcheck.nhs.uk/document.php?o=1472.
    1. Usher-Smith J, Martin A, Harte E, MacLure C, Meads C, Saunders C, et al. NHS Health Check programme rapid evidence synthesis. 2017. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Beswick A, Brindle P, Fahey T, Ebrahim S. A systematic review of risk scoring methods and clinical decision aids used in the primary prevention of coronary heart disease. R Coll Gen Pract [GRA] 2008;4:105. - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources