Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Feb 15;81(4):1163-1170.
doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-20-3094. Epub 2020 Dec 3.

Racial/Ethnic Disparities in All-Cause Mortality among Patients Diagnosed with Triple-Negative Breast Cancer

Affiliations

Racial/Ethnic Disparities in All-Cause Mortality among Patients Diagnosed with Triple-Negative Breast Cancer

Fei Wang et al. Cancer Res. .

Abstract

It is unclear whether racial/ethnic disparities in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) mortality remain after accounting for clinical characteristics, treatment, and access-to-care-related factors. In this study, women with a primary diagnosis of TNBC during 2010-2014 were identified from the National Cancer Database. Hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for 3- and 5-year all-cause mortality associated with race/ethnicity were estimated using Cox proportional hazards models with stepwise adjustments for age, clinical characteristics, treatment, and access-to-care-related factors. Of 78,708 patients, non-Hispanic (NH) black women had the lowest 3-year overall survival rates (79.4%), followed by NH-whites (83.1%), Hispanics (86.0%), and Asians (87.1%). After adjustment for clinical characteristics, NH-blacks had a 12% higher risk of dying 3 years post-diagnosis (HR, 1.12; 95% CI, 1.07-1.17), whereas Hispanics and Asians had a 24% (HR, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.70-0.83) and 17% (HR, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.73-0.94) lower risk than their NH-white counterparts. The black-white disparity became non-significant after combined adjustment for treatment and access-to-care-related factors (HR, 1.04; 95% CI, 0.99-1.09), whereas the white-Hispanic and white-Asian differences remained. Stratified analyses revealed that among women aged less than or equal to 50 with stage III cancer, the elevated risk among NH-blacks persisted (HR, 1.20; 95% CI, 1.04-1.39) after full adjustments. Similar results were seen for 5-year mortality. Overall, clinical characteristics, treatment, and access-to-care-related factors accounted for most of the white-black differences in all-cause mortality of TNBC but explained little about Hispanic- and Asian-white differences. SIGNIFICANCE: These findings highlight the need for equal healthcare to mitigate the black-white disparity and for investigations of contributors beyond healthcare for lower mortality among Asians and Hispanics.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of interest disclosures: The authors indicate no potential conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.. Multivariable-adjusted HRs (95% CI) for 3-year All-Cause Mortality in Triple Negative Breast Cancer Associated with Race/Ethnicity by Stage
The HRs and 95% CIs derived from: 0. Model 0. Adjusted for age at diagnosis (continuous). 1. Model 1. Additionally adjusted for clinical characteristics (histologic grade, histology type, tumor size, lymph node metastasis, distant metastasis, lymphovascular invasion, comorbidity). 2. Model 2. Additionally adjusted for treatment (surgery, radiation, chemotherapy, year of diagnosis and time-to-treatment) and factors related access to care (income, urban/rural residence, education, insurance, distance to care, facility type, and region of facility location). Abbreviation: HR, Hazard Ratio; CI, Confidence Interval.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.. Multivariable-adjusted HRs (95% CI) for 3-Year All-Cause Mortality in Triple Negative Breast Cancer Associated with Race/Ethnicity by Stage and Age
The HRs and 95% CIs derived from: 1. Model 1. Additionally adjusted for clinical characteristics (histologic grade, histology type, tumor size, lymph node metastasis, distant metastasis, lymphovascular invasion, comorbidity). 2. Model 2. Additionally adjusted for treatment (surgery, radiation, chemotherapy, year of diagnosis and time-to-treatment) and factors related access to care (income, urban/rural residence, education, insurance, distance to care, facility type, and region of facility location). Abbreviation: HR, Hazard Ratio; CI, Confidence Interval.

References

    1. Bianchini G, Balko JM, Mayer IA, Sanders ME, Gianni L. Triple-negative breast cancer: challenges and opportunities of a heterogeneous disease. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 2016;13:674–90. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Foulkes WD, Smith IE, Reis-Filho JS. Triple-negative breast cancer. N Engl J Med 2010;363:1938–48. - PubMed
    1. Malorni L, Shetty PB, De Angelis C, Hilsenbeck S, Rimawi MF, Elledge R, et al. Clinical and biologic features of triple-negative breast cancers in a large cohort of patients with long-term follow-up. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2012;136:795–804. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cheang MCU, Voduc D, Bajdik C, Leung S, McKinney S, Chia SK, et al. Basal-Like Breast Cancer Defined by Five Biomarkers Has Superior Prognostic Value than Triple-Negative Phenotype. Clin Cancer Res 2008;14:1368–76. - PubMed
    1. Newman LA, Kaljee LM. Health Disparities and Triple-Negative Breast Cancer in African American Women: A Review. JAMA Surg 2017;152:485–93. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms