Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Dec 3;10(1):21063.
doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-78152-1.

ALK variants, PD-L1 expression, and their association with outcomes in ALK-positive NSCLC patients

Affiliations

ALK variants, PD-L1 expression, and their association with outcomes in ALK-positive NSCLC patients

Gee-Chen Chang et al. Sci Rep. .

Abstract

It remains unclear how programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression interacts with anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) mutation, its variants, and the outcome of treatment. One hundred and twenty four out of 1255 patients (9.9%) were deemed ALK-positive by the Ventana IHC assay. PD-L1 status and ALK variants were available in 100 and 59 patients, respectively. PD-L1 positive (TPS ≥ 1%) and strong positive (TPS ≥ 50%) rate was 50% and 16%, respectively. A total of 64 variant types were detected in 59 patients. V1 (32.8%) and V3a/b (28.1%) were the most common variants. There was no significant association between ALK variants and the PD-L1 expression. The presence of V3a/b subtype independently predicted a worse overall survival in patients receiving ALK inhibitor(s) (aHR 5.10 [95% CI 1.22-21.25], P = 0.025) and platinum plus pemetrexed (aHR 9.62 [95% CI 1.90-48.80], P = 0.006). While incorporating ALK variants and PD-L1 expression together, patients with non-V3a/b/positive PD-L1 showed a trend towards longer OS. In conclusion, ALK-positive NSCLC patients possess a high PD-L1 expression rate. Although there was no significant association between PD-L1 expression and ALK variants, the outcome of ALK-positive patients could be sorted by these two biomarkers.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Association between cigarette smoking dose and ALK mutation (N, total cases; n, ALK-positive patients).
Figure 2
Figure 2
PD-L1 status and ALK variants in ALK-positive NSCLC patients (aTotal 64 variants were detected in 59 patients; bPatients with complex variants were categorized in the others).
Figure 3
Figure 3
Impact of ALK variants on the overall survival of ALK inhibitor(s) (a) and platinum plus pemetrexed (b) treatment.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Impact of ALK variants and PD-L1 expression status on the overall survival of patients receiving ALK inhibitor(s).

References

    1. Rikova K, et al. Global survey of phosphotyrosine signaling identifies oncogenic kinases in lung cancer. Cell. 2007;131:1190–1203. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2007.11.025. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Soda M, et al. Identification of the transforming EML4-ALK fusion gene in non-small-cell lung cancer. Nature. 2007;448:561–566. doi: 10.1038/nature05945. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Pikor LA, Ramnarine VR, Lam S, Lam WL. Genetic alterations defining NSCLC subtypes and their therapeutic implications. Lung Cancer. 2013;82:179–189. doi: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2013.07.025. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Camidge DR, et al. Brigatinib versus crizotinib in ALK-positive non-small-cell lung cancer. N. Engl. J. Med. 2018;379:2027–2039. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1810171. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Peters S, et al. Alectinib versus crizotinib in untreated ALK-positive non-small-cell lung cancer. N. Engl. J. Med. 2017;377:829–838. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1704795. - DOI - PubMed

MeSH terms