Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021 Apr;44(4):1095-1110.
doi: 10.1111/pce.13966. Epub 2020 Dec 22.

Social networking in crop plants: Wired and wireless cross-plant communications

Affiliations
Review

Social networking in crop plants: Wired and wireless cross-plant communications

Rouhallah Sharifi et al. Plant Cell Environ. 2021 Apr.

Abstract

The plant-associated microbial community (microbiome) has an important role in plant-plant communications. Plants decipher their complex habitat situations by sensing the environmental stimuli and molecular patterns and associated with microbes, herbivores and dangers. Perception of these cues generates inter/intracellular signals that induce modifications of plant metabolism and physiology. Signals can also be transferred between plants via different mechanisms, which we classify as wired- and wireless communications. Wired communications involve direct signal transfers between plants mediated by mycorrhizal hyphae and parasitic plant stems. Wireless communications involve plant volatile emissions and root exudates elicited by microbes/insects, which enable inter-plant signalling without physical contact. These producer-plant signals induce microbiome adaptation in receiver plants via facilitative or competitive mechanisms. Receiver plants eavesdrop to anticipate responses to improve fitness against stresses. An emerging body of information in plant-plant communication can be leveraged to improve integrated crop management under field conditions.

Keywords: dodder; herbivore-induced plant volatiles; holobiont; microbe-induced plant volatiles; microbiome adaptation; mycorrhiza.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Wired and wireless phytobiome communication. Clonal plants (right) communicate via physical connections (e.g. stolons and rhizomes) or VOCs. Plants also communicate via dodder and mycorrhiza (left). Receiver plants can act as nodes to transfer defence signals against pests and pathogens to neighbouring conspecific and heterospecific plants. Volatiles and root exudates received by neighbouring plants modulate receiver plant defence systems, attract parasitoids and entemopathogens and induce plant microbiome remodelling to protect plants against imminent stress conditions [Colour figure can be viewed at wileyonlinelibrary.com]
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Signals from neighbouring plants modulate signalling pathways in receiver plants and induce microbiome remodelling. Signals can be sensed by receiver proteins (e.g. ETR1 sensor for ethylene) or converted to active signals [e.g. SABP2 for salicylic acid (SA)]. Signals are transmitted through well‐characterized downstream pathways that may cross‐talk with each other. These signalling pathways regulate defence mechanisms against different groups of attackers and induce plant microbiome remodelling by changing root exudation, thereby adapting the plant holobiome to respond to imminent threats. ALMT1, aluminium‐activated malate transporter; AUX1/LAX, auxin resistant 1/LIKE AUX1; CDPK, Ca2+‐dependent protein kinases; CIPK, calcineurin B like proteins (CBL)‐interacting protein kinase; CTR1, constitutive triple response 1; EIN2, ethylene insensitive 2; ETR1, ethylene response 1; FIT1, FE‐deficiency‐inducing transcription factor 1; FRO2, ferric reductase oxidase 2; G3P, glycerol‐3‐phosphate; IAA, indole‐3‐acetic acid; IRT1, iron‐regulated transporter 1; JAZ, Jasmonate Zim domain protein; Med25, mediator 25; MeJA, methyl jasmonate; MeSA, methyl salicylate; NPR, non‐expresser of PR genes; ORA59, octadecanoid‐responsive Arabidopsis 59; SABP2, SA‐binding proteins 2; SCFCOI1, Skp1‐Cul1‐F‐box protein coronatine insensitive 1 [Colour figure can be viewed at wileyonlinelibrary.com]
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 3
Illustration of the signal input‐transfer‐output model in plant–plant communication. Molecular patterns, volatiles and effector proteins of pests and pathogens elicit plant signalling pathways that promote volatiles emission and root exudation. Plant signals can be delivered to neighbouring plants through the atmosphere or soil (wireless communication), or transferred through mycorrhiza, fungi and odder (wired communication). Signals can be converted to their active form by receiver plant proteins. Signal perception by neighbour plants activates signalling pathways and phosphorylation cascades, which subsequently induce the expression of defence‐related proteins and metabolites. Signal perception also changes the root exudate and recruits beneficial microbes. BZ, benzoxazinoid; GLVs, green leaf volatiles; HAMPs, herbivore‐associated molecular patterns; JA, jasmonic acid; MAMPs, microbe‐associated molecular patterns; MAPKs, mitogen‐activated protein kinases; MEP, methylerythritol phosphate; MeSA, methyl salicylate; MVA, mevalonic acid; SA, salicylic acid; TFs, transcription factors; VOCs, volatile organic compounds [Colour figure can be viewed at wileyonlinelibrary.com]

References

    1. Adesemoye, A. O. , Torbert, H. A. , & Kloepper, J. W. (2008). Enhanced plant nutrient use efficiency with PGPR and AMF in an integrated nutrient management system. Canadian Journal of Microbiology, 54, 876–886. - PubMed
    1. Alaux, P.‐L. , Naveau, F. , Declerck, S. , & Cranenbrouck, S. (2020). Common mycorrhizal network induced JA/ET genes expression in healthy potato plants connected to potato plants infected by Phytophthora infestans . Frontiers in Plant Science, 11, 602. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Alborn, H. , Turlings, T. , Jones, T. H. , Stenhagen, G. , Loughrin, J. , & Tumlinson, J. (1997). An elicitor of plant volatiles from beet armyworm oral secretion. Science, 276, 945–949.
    1. Alborn, H. T. , Hansen, T. V. , Jones, T. H. , Bennett, D. C. , Tumlinson, J. H. , Schmelz, E. A. , & Teal, P. E. (2007). Disulfooxy fatty acids from the American bird grasshopper Schistocerca americana, elicitors of plant volatiles. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 104, 12976–12981. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ali, J. G. , Alborn, H. T. , & Stelinski, L. L. (2011). Constitutive and induced subterranean plant volatiles attract both entomopathogenic and plant parasitic nematodes. Journal of Ecology, 99, 26–35.

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources