Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021 Mar;11(3):545-559.
doi: 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-20-0779. Epub 2020 Dec 4.

Opportunities and Challenges in Drug Development for Pediatric Cancers

Affiliations
Review

Opportunities and Challenges in Drug Development for Pediatric Cancers

Theodore W Laetsch et al. Cancer Discov. 2021 Mar.

Abstract

The use of targeted small-molecule therapeutics and immunotherapeutics has been limited to date in pediatric oncology. Recently, the number of pediatric approvals has risen, and regulatory initiatives in the United States and Europe have aimed to increase the study of novel anticancer therapies in children. Challenges of drug development in children include the rarity of individual cancer diagnoses and the high prevalence of difficult-to-drug targets, including transcription factors and epigenetic regulators. Ongoing pediatric adaptation of biomarker-driven trial designs and further exploration of agents targeting non-kinase drivers constitute high-priority objectives for future pediatric oncology drug development. SIGNIFICANCE: Increasing attention to drug development for children with cancer by regulators and pharmaceutical companies holds the promise of accelerating the availability of new therapies for children with cancer, potentially improving survival and decreasing the acute and chronic toxicities of therapy. However, unique approaches are necessary to study novel therapies in children that take into account low patient numbers, the pediatric cancer genomic landscape and tumor microenvironment, and the need for pediatric formulations. It is also critical to evaluate the potential for unique toxicities in growing hosts without affecting the pace of discovery for children with these life-threatening diseases.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1:
Figure 1:
Key stakeholders contributing to rational pediatric cancer drug development.

References

    1. Oeffinger KC, Mertens AC, Sklar CA, Kawashima T, Hudson MM, Meadows AT, et al. Chronic health conditions in adult survivors of childhood cancer. N Engl J Med 2006;355(15):1572–82 - PubMed
    1. Hunger SP, Mullighan CG. Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia in Children. N Engl J Med 2015;373(16):1541–52 - PubMed
    1. Dorris K, Liu C, Li D, Hummel TR, Wang X, Perentesis J, et al. A comparison of safety and efficacy of cytotoxic versus molecularly targeted drugs in pediatric phase I solid tumor oncology trials. Pediatric blood & cancer 2017;64(3) - PubMed
    1. Pappo AS, Furman WL, Schultz KA, Ferrari A, Helman L, Krailo MD. Rare Tumors in Children: Progress Through Collaboration. Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology 2015;33(27):3047–54 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Shima H, Tokuyama M, Tanizawa A, Tono C, Hamamoto K, Muramatsu H, et al. Distinct impact of imatinib on growth at prepubertal and pubertal ages of children with chronic myeloid leukemia. The Journal of pediatrics 2011;159(4):676–81 - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms