Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Dec 4;11(1):6220.
doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-19993-2.

Pervasive subduction zone devolatilization recycles CO2 into the forearc

Affiliations

Pervasive subduction zone devolatilization recycles CO2 into the forearc

E M Stewart et al. Nat Commun. .

Abstract

The fate of subducted CO2 remains the subject of widespread disagreement, with different models predicting either wholesale (up to 99%) decarbonation of the subducting slab or extremely limited carbon loss and, consequently, massive deep subduction of CO2. The fluid history of subducted rocks lies at the heart of this debate: rocks that experience significant infiltration by a water-bearing fluid may release orders of magnitude more CO2 than rocks that are metamorphosed in a closed chemical system. Numerical models make a wide range of predictions regarding water mobility, and further progress has been limited by a lack of direct observations. Here we present a comprehensive field-based study of decarbonation efficiency in a subducting slab (Cyclades, Greece), and show that ~40% to ~65% of the CO2 in subducting crust is released via metamorphic decarbonation reactions at forearc depths. This result precludes extensive deep subduction of most CO2 and suggests that the mantle has become more depleted in carbon over geologic time.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1. Equilibrium fluid compositions.
Blue squares show maximum possible fluid CO2 activity of each sample. The equivalent XCO2 is shown on the right axis. Note the nonlinear relationship between activity of CO2 and XCO2. Red circles are CO2 activities achieved in a closed system. The vast majority of samples record water-rich fluids, inconsistent with evolution in a closed system. Two samples are unconstrained, with any CO2 activity < ~0.95 being plausible (blue arrows). The shaded area shows the 2σ standard deviation range of equilibrium activity values (0.06 ± 0.07), excluding the two unconstrained outliers.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2. Carbon and oxygen isotopes.
The 211 isotope measurements of metamorphic carbonate minerals record a wide array of δ13C and δ18O values that differ from unaltered seafloor carbonate. Uncertainties of <0.1‰ (1σ) are smaller than plotted circles.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3. Degree of decarbonation.
Blue symbols show the observed CO2 loss of each sample whereas green symbols show the maximum potential CO2 loss as a function of initial wt% CO2. a Percent of CO2 released. Nearly pure carbonate rocks degas the smallest proportion of CO2. b The kg CO2 released per kg rock. This shows a peaked distribution, with intermediate-CO2-content rocks degassing the greatest mass of CO2 in both observed and potential datasets.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4. Carbon flux.
a The percentage of CO2 degassed along two linear P–T paths. Both paths begin at 310 °C and 1.0 GPa; path A continues through peak field conditions of 525 °C and 1.5 GPa, while path B passes through 550 °C and 2.0 GPa. Paths A and B end at 650 °C and 1.8 or 2.4 GPa, respectively. A sharp pulse of decarbonation is seen around peak-T conditions. b The constructed moles of CO2 subducting globally and the amount of CO2 released at both peak conditions (observed) and up to 650 °C (observed + modeled). The arc volcanic CO2 flux is shown for reference.
Fig. 5
Fig. 5. Global mass balance.
This schematic representation shows the ~40% CO2 loss recorded in the field and the total predicted 65% CO2 loss by 650 °C in the forearc; most decarbonation is concentrated in a sharp peak at ~500–550 °C. The remaining ~35% of subducted CO2 in the slab continues to greater depths where it could be released by processes such as dissolution or melting, or retained in the slab past the subarc. Global estimates are based on observations from the Cycladic Blueschist Unit.

References

    1. Dasgupta R, Hirschmann MM. The deep carbon cycle and melting in Earth’s interior. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 2010;298:1–13. doi: 10.1016/j.epsl.2010.06.039. - DOI
    1. Kelemen PB, Manning CE. Reevaluating carbon fluxes in subduction zones, what goes down, mostly comes up. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2015;112:E3997–E4006. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1507889112. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Plank T, Manning CE. Subducting carbon. Nature. 2019;574:343–352. doi: 10.1038/s41586-019-1643-z. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hirschmann MM. Comparative deep Earth volatile cycles: the case for C recycling from exosphere/mantle fractionation of major (H2O, C, N) volatiles and from H2O/Ce, CO2/Ba, and CO2/Nb exosphere ratios. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 2018;502:262–273. doi: 10.1016/j.epsl.2018.08.023. - DOI
    1. Goldschmidt VM. Die Gesetze der Gesteinsmetamorphose mit Beispielen aus der Geologie des Südlichen Norwegens (the laws of rock metamorphism with examples from the geology of southern Norway) Norsk Videnskapsselskaps Skrifter I. Matematisk-Naturvidenskapelig Klasse. 1912;22:1–16.

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources