Response to the Comment on "Outcomes After Minimally-invasive Versus Open Pancreatoduodenectomy"
- PMID: 33278167
- DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000004278
Response to the Comment on "Outcomes After Minimally-invasive Versus Open Pancreatoduodenectomy"
Conflict of interest statement
The authors report no conflicts of interest.
Comment on
-
Outcomes After Minimally-invasive Versus Open Pancreatoduodenectomy: A Pan-European Propensity Score Matched Study.Ann Surg. 2020 Feb;271(2):356-363. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002850. Ann Surg. 2020. PMID: 29864089
-
Comment on "Outcomes After Minimally Invasive Versus Open Pancreatoduodenectomy".Ann Surg. 2021 Dec 1;274(6):e733. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000004289. Ann Surg. 2021. PMID: 33074879 No abstract available.
References
-
- Klompmaker S, Van Hilst J, Wellner UF, et al. Outcomes after minimally-invasive versus open pancreatoduodenectomy: a pan-european propensity score matched study. Ann Surg 2020; 271:356–363.
-
- Birkmeyer JD, Finks JF, O’Reilly A, et al. Surgical skill and complication rates after bariatric surgery. N Engl J Med 2013; 369:1434–1442.
-
- Birkmeyer JD, Stukel TA, Siewers AE, et al. Surgeon volume and operative mortality in the United States. N Engl J Med 2003; 349:2117–2127.
-
- Asbun HJ, Moekotte AL, Vissers FL, et al. The Miami International evidence-based guidelines on minimally invasive pancreas resection. Ann Surg 2020; 271:1–14.
-
- de Rooij T, van Hilst J, van Santvoort H, et al. Minimally invasive versus open distal pancreatectomy (LEOPARD): a multicenter patient-blinded randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg 2019; 269:2–9.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
