Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2020 Dec 5;59(Suppl5):v4-v11.
doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/keaa379.

Classifying and diagnosing systemic lupus erythematosus in the 21st century

Affiliations
Review

Classifying and diagnosing systemic lupus erythematosus in the 21st century

Martin Aringer et al. Rheumatology (Oxford). .

Abstract

The EULAR/ACR 2019 classification criteria for SLE constitute a current and optimized clinical approach to SLE classification. Classification is still not based on molecular approaches and the results from large studies using polyomics may be interpreted as demonstrating the relevance of the genetic and environmental background rather than splitting SLE into several entities. In fact, an association study within the EULAR/ACR classification criteria project found associations between manifestations only within organ domains. This independency of various organ manifestations argues for SLE as one disease entity. The current review article will therefore concentrate on the clinical and immunological manifestations of SLE and on what we have already learned in this century. Moreover, the structure and essential rules of the EULAR/ACR 2019 classification criteria will be discussed. While classification and diagnosis are distinct concepts, which have to remain clearly separated, information derived from the process towards the classification criteria is also useful for diagnostic purposes. Therefore this article also tries to delineate what classification can teach us for diagnosis, covering a wide variety of SLE manifestations.

Keywords: autoantibodies; classification; diagnosis; nephritis; systemic lupus erythematosus.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Aringer M, Costenbader K, Daikh D et al. 2019 European League Against Rheumatism/American College of Rheumatology classification criteria for systemic lupus erythematosus. Ann Rheum Dis 2019;78:1151–9. - PubMed
    1. Aringer M, Costenbader K, Daikh D et al. 2019 European League Against Rheumatism/American College of Rheumatology classification criteria for systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis Rheumatol 2019;71:1400–12. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Petri M, Orbai AM, Alarcon GS et al. Derivation and validation of systemic lupus international collaborating clinics classification criteria for systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis Rheum 2012;64:2677–86. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Touma Z, Cervera R, Brinks R et al. Associations among classification criteria items within systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 2019;doi: 10.1002/acr.24078. - PubMed
    1. Aringer M, Dorner T, Leuchten N, Johnson SR. Toward new criteria for systemic lupus erythematosus-a standpoint. Lupus 2016;25:805–11. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances