Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Jun;52(6):1061-1069.
doi: 10.1111/imj.15146. Epub 2022 May 31.

Outcomes of patients with delayed surveillance colonoscopy

Cameron Schauer  1 , Allan Plant  1 , Alain Vandal  2   3 , Adrian Claydon  1
Affiliations

Outcomes of patients with delayed surveillance colonoscopy

Cameron Schauer et al. Intern Med J. 2022 Jun.

Abstract

Background: Surveillance colonoscopy has been shown to be an effective tool for prevention of colorectal cancer (CRC) in high-risk populations, if adhered to.

Aim: To discover the sequelae of late surveillance in a cohort of patient's overdue for colonoscopy.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study on all patients from the Bay of Plenty District Health Board region, New Zealand, placed on the colonoscopy surveillance waitlist from 2006 onwards who had their procedure completed between 1 November 2016 and 31 January 2018. Patients with overdue surveillance, defined as done later than 90 days after the recommended due date, were compared with patients who were done either early or on time.

Results: A total of 786 patients was recorded as overdue for surveillance colonoscopy and 386 were completed early or on time. The median time overdue was 22 months. Three (0.4%) cases of CRC were found in overdue patients compared with four (1%) cases for those done on time (adjusted P = 0.24). There were 86 (11%) advanced adenomas (AA) in patients overdue compared with 27 (7%) in those not overdue (odds ratio (OR) 1.6; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.0-2.5; P = 0.04). Surveillance of 180 high-risk post-polypectomy patients identified 2 CRC and 8/43 AA in those overdue compared with no CRC and 9/137 AA (18.6% vs 6.6%; OR 1.79; 95% CI 1.07-2.0; unadjusted P = 0.03) in those done on time.

Conclusion: While overdue surveillance is not predictive of increased CRC, it is associated with an increase in expected number of AA, particularly in patients having surveillance for previous high-risk polypectomy.

Keywords: colonoscopy; colorectal cancer; surveillance.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Ministry of Health. Cancer: New Registrations and Deaths 2006. Wellington: Ministry of Health; 2010. Available from URL: http://www.moh.govt.nz/moh.nsf/indexmh/cancer-reg-deaths-2006
    1. Ministry of Health NZ Cancer Projections: Incidence 2004-08 to 2014-18. [cited 2020 Feb 29]. Available from URL: https://www.health.govt.nz/publication/cancer-projections-incidence-2004...
    1. Araghi M, Soerjomataram I, Jenkins M, Brierley J, Morris E, Bray F et al. Global trends in colorectal cancer mortality: projections to the year 2035. Int J Cancer 2019; 144: 2992-3000.
    1. Becker F, Nusko G, Welke J, Hahn EG, Mansmann U. Follow-up after colorectal polypectomy: a benefit - risk analysis of German surveillance recommendations. Int J Colorectal Dis 2007; 22: 929-39.
    1. Saini SD, Schoenfeld P, Vijan S, Surveillance Colonoscopy I. Cost-effective for patients with adenomas who are at high risk of colorectal cancer. Gastroenterology 2010; 138: 2292-9.

LinkOut - more resources