Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2020 Nov 12:14:566428.
doi: 10.3389/fnins.2020.566428. eCollection 2020.

Neurodegenerative Disorders of the Eye and of the Brain: A Perspective on Their Fluid-Dynamical Connections and the Potential of Mechanism-Driven Modeling

Affiliations
Review

Neurodegenerative Disorders of the Eye and of the Brain: A Perspective on Their Fluid-Dynamical Connections and the Potential of Mechanism-Driven Modeling

Giovanna Guidoboni et al. Front Neurosci. .

Abstract

Neurodegenerative disorders (NDD) such as Alzheimer's and Parkinson's diseases are significant causes of morbidity and mortality worldwide. The pathophysiology of NDD is still debated, and there is an urgent need to understand the mechanisms behind the onset and progression of these heterogenous diseases. The eye represents a unique window to the brain that can be easily assessed via non-invasive ocular imaging. As such, ocular measurements have been recently considered as potential sources of biomarkers for the early detection and management of NDD. However, the current use of ocular biomarkers in the clinical management of NDD patients is particularly challenging. Specifically, many ocular biomarkers are influenced by local and systemic factors that exhibit significant variation among individuals. In addition, there is a lack of methodology available for interpreting the outcomes of ocular examinations in NDD. Recently, mathematical modeling has emerged as an important tool capable of shedding light on the pathophysiology of multifactorial diseases and enhancing analysis and interpretation of clinical results. In this article, we review and discuss the clinical evidence of the relationship between NDD in the brain and in the eye and explore the potential use of mathematical modeling to facilitate NDD diagnosis and management based upon ocular biomarkers.

Keywords: cerebrospinal fluid pressure; fluid-dynamics; glaucoma; intraocular pressure; mathematical modeling; neurodegenerative disorders.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Techniques for non-invasive ocular measurements (Guidoboni et al., 2013). (A) Fundus camera; (B) Color Doppler Imaging; (C) Fourier-Domain Optical Coherence Tomography (FD-OCT); (D) Retinal Oximetry. Images reproduced from Guidoboni et al. (2013), with permission.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Schematic overview of the multiscale modeling framework implemented in the Ocular Mathematical Virtual Simulator (OMVS). Image reproduced from Sala et al. (2018a), with permission. OA, ophthalmic artery; OV, ophthalmic vein; CRA, central retinal artery; CRV, central retinal vein; NPCA, nasal posterior ciliary artery; TPCA, temporal posterior ciliary artery; IOP, intraocular pressure; CSF, cerebrospinal fluid.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Illustrative schematic of the outputs that can be predicted by means of the Ocular Mathematical Virtual Simulator (OMVS) (Sala, 2019). The outputs include: quantitative three-dimensional colormaps of pressure, perfusion, and displacement fields in the lamina cribrosa (A,E), with the possibility of plotting profiles along specific sections or lines (B,F,H); quantitative three-dimensional colormaps of distributions of displacement in the ocular tissues (C,D); time-dependent velocity waveforms in the central artery and vein (G). LC, lamina cribrosa; CRA, central retinal artery; CRV, central retinal vein.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Cerebral venous hemodynamics. (Left) Pressure field. (Right) Streamlines. Images reproduced from Bertoluzza et al. (2017), with permission.

References

    1. Akkus Z., Galimzianova A., Hoogi A., Rubin D. L., Erickson B. J. (2017). Deep learning for brain MRI segmentation: state of the art and future directions. J. Digit. Imaging 30, 449–459. 10.1007/s10278-017-9983-4 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Alber J., Goldfarb D., Thompson L. I., Arthur E., Hernandez K., Cheng D., et al. . (2020). Developing retinal biomarkers for the earliest stages of Alzheimer's disease: what we know, what we don't, and how to move forward. Alzheimer's Dement. 16, 229–243. 10.1002/alz.12006 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Arciero J., Carichino L., Cassani S., Guidoboni G. (2019). Mathematical modeling of blood flow in the eye, in Ocular Fluid Dynamics: Anatomy, Physiology, Imaging Techniques, and Mathematical Modeling, eds Guidoboni G., Harris A., Sacco R. (New York, NY: Springer-Birkhäuser; ), 101–157. 10.1007/978-3-030-25886-3_5 - DOI
    1. Arciero J., Harris A., Siesky B., Amireskandari A., Gershuny V., Pickrell A., et al. . (2013). Theoretical analysis of vascular regulatory mechanisms contributing to retinal blood flow autoregulation. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 54, 5584–5593. 10.1167/iovs.12-11543 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Baker R. E., Pena J.-M., Jayamohan J., Jérusalem A. (2018). Mechanistic models versus machine learning, a fight worth fighting for the biological community? Biol. Lett. 14:20170660. 10.1098/rsbl.2017.0660 - DOI - PMC - PubMed