Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Nov 13:11:566766.
doi: 10.3389/fphys.2020.566766. eCollection 2020.

Advanced 3D "Modeling" and "Printing" for the Surgical Planning of a Successful Case of Thoraco-Omphalopagus Conjoined Twins Separation

Affiliations

Advanced 3D "Modeling" and "Printing" for the Surgical Planning of a Successful Case of Thoraco-Omphalopagus Conjoined Twins Separation

Alessandro Inserra et al. Front Physiol. .

Abstract

Background: The surgical separation of two Conjoined Twins is a particularly complex operation. Surgical times are particularly long and post-operative complications are very frequent in this type of procedure. We report a clinical case of surgical separation of two thoraco-omphalopagus conjoined twins in which, thanks to the use of (3D) three dimensional technologies, we were able to significantly reduce operative times and improve clinical outcomes.

Methods: We performed a 3D reconstruction of the anatomical parts involved in congenital fusion using Computer Tomography (CT) images.We obtained virtual anatomical models of the patients which allowed us to estimate essential details as the residual post-operative thoracic volume as well as the exact position of resection planes for both the general separation and for the hepatic splitting procedure. Subsequently, we printed 3D anatomical models of the thoracic cage and sternum and of the liver with the plane of resection. Finally, we printed an additional 3D anatomical model of the two patients representing different organs with multiple colors and materials.

Results: The use of 3D printing reduced the duration of surgery by 30% with a favorable patient outcome. Two years after the operation, the patients do not present any type of deficit and have a normal life without any significant complication.

Conclusion: Virtual anatomical 3D models and 3D printing represent a valid technological tool to support complex surgical operations, especially in pre-surgical planning. 3D models are important tools to better understand complex anatomy and to discuss clinical cases among members of the surgical team.

Keywords: 3D images; 3D printing; 3D printing in cardiothoracic surgery; 3D printing in surgery; conjoined twins.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
CT sagittal images of the entire conjoined anatomical structures (A), 3D virtual reconstruction of patient’s anatomy (B), multi-color and multi-material 3D printed anatomical model (C).
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
3D virtual reconstruction of liver and hepatic vascularization from CT images (A), multi-color and multi-material 3D printed liver (B). 3D model of the ribcage with conjoined sternum (C), 3D print of the ribcage with white Polylactic Acid material (D).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Bugaje M. A., McHoney M., Ameh E. A., Lakhoo K. (2010). “Omphalitis,” in Paediatric Surgery: A Comprehensive Text For Africa. help_pedsurgeryafricavolume01.pdf, Vol. 1 eds Stephen E. A., Bickler W., Lakhoo K., Poenaru D. (Seattle, Washington, DC: Global Help; ), 124–128.
    1. Guerriero L., Quero G., Diana M., Soler L., Agnus V., Marescaux J., et al. (2018). Virtual reality exploration and planning for precision colorectal surgery. Dis. Colon Rectum. 61 719–723. 10.1097/DCR.0000000000001077 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Jensen K., Bjerrum F., Hansen H. J., Petersen R. H., Pedersen J. H., Konge L. (2015). A new possibility in thoracoscopic virtual reality simulation training: development and testing of a novel virtual reality simulator for video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery lobectomy. Interact. Cardiovasc. Thorac. Surg. 21 420–426. 10.1093/icvts/ivv183 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Mitsouras D., Liacouras P., Imanzadeh A., Giannopoulos A. A., Cai T., Kumamaru K. K., et al. (2015). Medical 3D printing for the radiologist. RadioGraphics 35 1965–1988. 10.1148/rg.2015140320 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Panigrahy A., Caruthers S. D., Krejza J., Barnes P. D., Faddoul S. G., Sleeper L. A., et al. (2000). Registration of three-dimensional MR and CT studies of the cervical spine. Am. J. Neuroradiol. 8 282–289. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources