Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Oct 27;11(11):6710-6720.
doi: 10.1364/BOE.408481. eCollection 2020 Nov 1.

Relative retinal flow velocity detection using optical coherence tomography angiography imaging

Affiliations

Relative retinal flow velocity detection using optical coherence tomography angiography imaging

Dmitry Richter et al. Biomed Opt Express. .

Abstract

Optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA) imaging is a valuable tool for the visualization of retinal vasculature at an unprecedented level of details. However, due to relatively long time-interval between repeated scans in the conventional OCTA scanning protocol, the OCTA flow signal suffers from low dynamic range and loss of velocity-intensity correlation. The ability to distinguish fast and slow flow in the retina may provide a powerful tool for the assessment of early-stage retinal diseases such as vein occlusion. Here, we report a method to detect relative flow velocity in human retina using a 67.5 kHz spectral-domain OCTA device. By adapting the selection of A-scan time-intervals within a single OCTA acquisition and combining the resulting OCTA images, we expand the detectable velocity range. After a quantitative validation of this method performing microchannel flow experiments with varying flow velocities, we demonstrate this approach on human eyes using CIRRUS HD-OCT 5000 with AngioPlex (ZEISS, Dublin, CA) through a prototype scanning pattern.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

D. Richter, None; A. M. Fard, Carl Zeiss Meditec (E); J. Straub, Carl Zeiss Meditec (E); W. Wei, Carl Zeiss Meditec (C); Q. Zhang, Carl Zeiss Meditec (C), R. K. Wang, Carl Zeiss Meditec (C)

Figures

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.
(A) Illustration of the scanning algorithm. A-scans performed n times (ΔT = time-interval between A-Scans considered for decorrelation) at the same location before beam was moved to the next position. (B) Schematic of the experimental setup. For microchannel experiments, a mixture of milk and distilled water (1:10 mixing ratio) was introduced into phantom through a syringe pump. Red area: the scanning area. (C) OCT cross-section through microfluidic phantom. Dotted line: detected rear surface. Microchannel expresses strong signal. (D) OCT cross-section through human eye. Data averaging was performed between ILM and RPE (yellow dotted lines). Inserts show OCTA signal from region of interest (yellow) and the Choroid layer (red). Scalebars: 200 μm, Inset: 500 μm
Fig. 2.
Fig. 2.
Representative flow calibration table for microchannel experiments. For different interval-times ΔT the OCTA signal was measured at various flow rates. The OCTA signal increases with longer interval-times ΔT at constant flow rates. Similarly, the OCTA signal gets stronger with higher flow rates at constant interval-times ΔT. Arrow represents the flow direction. Note: Here, images have not been corrected for background.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 3.
(A) Calibration graphs obtained by microchannel experiments for different interval-times ΔT. Note, that for ΔT=75 μs and ΔT=90 μs the flow signal saturates at low flow speeds and therefore does not contribute to the calibration. (B) Calibration graphs at two different interval-times ΔT=60 μs and 45 μs taken at two different microchannels (light green/blue=60 μm and dark green/blue=240 μm). (C) Representative calibration measurement for ΔT=60 μs. Input flow velocities in mm/s. Influx (red arrow) detected only for flow velocities beyond v>3 mm/s and cannot be distinguished for v>16 mm/s. Scalebar: 500μm.
Fig. 4.
Fig. 4.
(A) Idealized OCTA intensity (normalized) profiles for different interval-times ΔT. Underlying color marks the sensitive flow range of each ΔT setting. (B) Signal sensitivity at different flow velocities for different interval-times ΔT. (C) Normalized OCT signal intensity at most sensitive flow ranges for different time-intervals ΔT. Each flow velocity range can be efficiently detected by different time-intervals ΔT. By combining all four parts the flow velocity can be measured over a larger range.
Fig. 5.
Fig. 5.
OCTA images of a micro-channel with different interval-times ΔT and constant flow (v = 8 mm/s) and the combined image forming a velocity map. Blue: v<10 mm/s, green: v=10-25 mm/s, red: v>25 mm/s. Arrow indicates flow direction. Scalebar: 500μm.
Fig. 6.
Fig. 6.
(A) Blood flow maps at three different regions of a healthy human subject. Red, green and blue areas correspond to fast (ΔT=15 μs), moderate (ΔT=45 μs) and slow blood flow (ΔT=60 μs) which were most sensitive at different ΔT-settings, respectively. Insert: Cross-section through retinal vessel (pink line). Yellow color represents fast flow. Blue color indicates slow flow. Scalebars: 250 μm Inset: 50 μm. (B) Combined image of the velocity map and a standard angiography image. Hot-color bar indicates the flow velocity. (C) Left: OCTA signal maps at time-interval ΔT=15 μs, ΔT=45 μs and ΔT=60 μs, respectively. right: Color-coded relative flow velocity map of the same vascular network visualized by the simultaneous representation of slow (blue, ΔT=60 μs), moderate (green, ΔT=45 μs) and fast (red, ΔT=15 μs) flow regimes. Scalebars: 250 μm

References

    1. Huang D., Swanson E. A., Lin C. P., Schuhman J. S., Stinson W. G., Chang W., Hee M. R., Flotte T., Gregory K., Puliafito C. A., Fujimoto J. G., “Optical Coherence Tomography,” Science 254(5035), 1178–1181 (1991).10.1126/science.1957169 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Fercher A., Hitzenberger C. K., Drexler W., Kamp G., Sattman H., “In vivo optical coherence tomography,” Am. J. Ophthalmol. 116(1), 113–114 (1993).10.1016/S0002-9394(14)71762-3 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Makita S., Hong Y., Yamanari M., Yatagai T., Yasuno Y., “Optical coherence angiography,” Opt. Express 14(17), 7821–7840 (2006).10.1364/OE.14.007821 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Lujan B. J., Gregori G., Flynn Jr H. W., Kay C. N., Gendy M. G., “Composite spectral domain optical coherence tomography images of diabetic tractional retinal detachment,” OSLI 39(7), S99–S103 (2008).10.3928/15428877-20080715-06 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Burgansky-Eliash Z., Barash H., Nelson D., Grinvald A., Sorkin A., Loewenstein A., Barak A., “Retinal blood flow velocity in patients with age-related macular degeneration,” Curr. Eye Res. 39(3), 304–311 (2014).10.3109/02713683.2013.840384 - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources