Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2020 Nov 12:7:588845.
doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2020.588845. eCollection 2020.

Management of Pelvic Ring Injury Patients With Hemodynamic Instability

Affiliations
Review

Management of Pelvic Ring Injury Patients With Hemodynamic Instability

Meir Marmor et al. Front Surg. .

Abstract

Pelvic ring injuries (PRI) are among the most difficult injuries to deal with in orthopedic trauma. When these injuries are accompanied by hemodynamic instability their management becomes significantly more complex. A methodical assessment and expeditious triage are required for these patients followed by adequate resuscitation. A major triage decision is whether these patients should undergo arterial embolization in the angiography suit or prompt packing and pelvic stabilization in the operating room. Patient characteristics, fracture type and injury characteristics are taken into consideration in the decision-making process. In this review we discuss the acute evaluation, triage and management of PRIs associated with hemodynamic instability. An evidence based and protocol driven approach is necessary in order to achieve optimal outcomes in these patients.

Keywords: angioembolization; bleeding; hemodynamic instability; pelvic fracture; pre-peritoneal pelvic packing; resuscitation; shock; triage.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Triage algorithm for patients with hemodynamic instability and unstable pelvic ring injuries.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. American College of Surgeons Advanced Trauma Life Support. 10th ed Chicago, IL: American College of Surgeons; (2018).
    1. Perkins ZB, Maytham GD, Koers L, Bates P, Brohi K, Tai NRM. Impact on outcome of a targeted performance improvement programme in haemodynamically unstable patients with a pelvic fracture. Bone Joint J. (2014) 96-B:1090–7. 10.1302/0301-620X.96B8.33383 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Balogh Z, Caldwell E, Heetveld M, D'Amours S, Schlaphoff G, Harris I, et al. . Institutional practice guidelines on management of pelvic fracture-related hemodynamic instability: do they make a difference? J Trauma. (2005) 58:778–82. 10.1097/01.TA.0000158251.40760.B2 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Mutschler M, Nienaber U, Brockamp T, Wafaisade A, Fabian T, Paffrath T, et al. . Renaissance of base deficit for the initial assessment of trauma patients: a base deficit-based classification for hypovolemic shock developed on data from 16,305 patients derived from the TraumaRegister DGU®. Crit Care. (2013) 17:R42. 10.1186/cc12555 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Mutschler M, Nienaber U, Münzberg M, Wölfl C, Schoechl H, Paffrath T, et al. . The shock index revisited—a fast guide to transfusion requirement? A retrospective analysis on 21,853 patients derived from the TraumaRegister DGU. Crit Care. (2013) 17:R172. 10.1186/cc12851 - DOI - PMC - PubMed