Does Geometric Algebra Provide a Loophole to Bell's Theorem?
- PMID: 33285836
- PMCID: PMC7516493
- DOI: 10.3390/e22010061
Does Geometric Algebra Provide a Loophole to Bell's Theorem?
Erratum in
-
Correction: Gill, R.D. Does Geometric Algebra Provide a Loophole to Bell's Theorem? Entropy 2020, 22, 61.Entropy (Basel). 2021 May 19;23(5):631. doi: 10.3390/e23050631. Entropy (Basel). 2021. PMID: 34069755 Free PMC article.
Abstract
In 2007, and in a series of later papers, Joy Christian claimed to refute Bell's theorem, presenting an alleged local realistic model of the singlet correlations using techniques from geometric algebra (GA). Several authors published papers refuting his claims, and Christian's ideas did not gain acceptance. However, he recently succeeded in publishing yet more ambitious and complex versions of his theory in fairly mainstream journals. How could this be? The mathematics and logic of Bell's theorem is simple and transparent and has been intensely studied and debated for over 50 years. Christian claims to have a mathematical counterexample to a purely mathematical theorem. Each new version of Christian's model used new devices to circumvent Bell's theorem or depended on a new way to misunderstand Bell's work. These devices and misinterpretations are in common use by other Bell critics, so it useful to identify and name them. I hope that this paper can serve as a useful resource to those who need to evaluate new "disproofs of Bell's theorem". Christian's fundamental idea is simple and quite original: he gives a probabilistic interpretation of the fundamental GA equation a · b = ( a b + b a ) / 2 . After that, ambiguous notation and technical complexity allows sign errors to be hidden from sight, and new mathematical errors can be introduced.
Keywords: Bell’s theorem; Clifford algebra; geometric algebra; quantum information.
Conflict of interest statement
The author declares no conflict of interest.
References
-
- Bell J.S. On the Einstein Podolsky Rosen Paradox. Physics 1. 1964;1:195. doi: 10.1103/PhysicsPhysiqueFizika.1.195. - DOI
-
- Einstein A., Podolsky B., Rosen N. Can quantum-mechanical description of physical reality be considered complete? Phys. Rev. 1935;16:777–780. doi: 10.1103/PhysRev.47.777. - DOI
-
- Bohm D., Aharonov Y. Discussion of experimental proof for the paradox of Einstein, Rosen and Podolsky. Phys. Rev. 1957;108:1070–1076. doi: 10.1103/PhysRev.108.1070. - DOI
-
- Wu C.S., Shaknov I. The angular correlation of scattered annihilation radiation. Phys. Rev. 1950;77:136. doi: 10.1103/PhysRev.77.136. - DOI
-
- Christian J. Disproof of Bell’s Theorem: Illuminating the Illusion of Entanglement. Brown Walker Press; Boca Raton, FL, USA: 2014.
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
