Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2020 Feb 20;22(2):239.
doi: 10.3390/e22020239.

Complexity Analysis of EEG, MEG, and fMRI in Mild Cognitive Impairment and Alzheimer's Disease: A Review

Affiliations
Review

Complexity Analysis of EEG, MEG, and fMRI in Mild Cognitive Impairment and Alzheimer's Disease: A Review

Jie Sun et al. Entropy (Basel). .

Abstract

Alzheimer's disease (AD) is a degenerative brain disease with a high and irreversible incidence. In recent years, because brain signals have complex nonlinear dynamics, there has been growing interest in studying complex changes in the time series of brain signals in patients with AD. We reviewed studies of complexity analyses of single-channel time series from electroencephalogram (EEG), magnetoencephalogram (MEG), and functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) in AD and determined future research directions. A systematic literature search for 2000-2019 was performed in the Web of Science and PubMed databases, resulting in 126 identified studies. Compared to healthy individuals, the signals from AD patients have less complexity and more predictable oscillations, which are found mainly in the left parietal, occipital, right frontal, and temporal regions. This complexity is considered a potential biomarker for accurately responding to the functional lesion in AD. The current review helps to reveal the patterns of dysfunction in the brains of patients with AD and to investigate whether signal complexity can be used as a biomarker to accurately respond to the functional lesion in AD. We proposed further studies in the signal complexities of AD patients, including investigating the reliability of complexity algorithms and the spatial patterns of signal complexity. In conclusion, the current review helps to better understand the complexity of abnormalities in the AD brain and provide useful information for AD diagnosis.

Keywords: Alzheimer’s disease; biomarker; brain signals; complexity; single-channel analysis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Selection diagram, including three stages: identification, screening, and inclusion. This process led from 382 initial studies to 126 final studies.
Figure 2
Figure 2
(A) Three modes of data categorization reviewed in the study. The inner circle shows the different brain imaging modalities, while the outer circle shows specific complexity analysis methods. (B) Trends in the number of included studies using the different brain imaging techniques versus date.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Comparative values of entropy from five regions across the brain in Alzheimer’s disease (AD), mild cognitive impairment (MCI), and control subjects [18,81].
Figure 4
Figure 4
Entropy at different scales in different regions of the brain [82,84].
Figure 5
Figure 5
Entropy in different frequency bands across the brain in AD, MCI, and control subjects [81].
Figure 6
Figure 6
Entropy from different brain regions [48,113].
Figure 7
Figure 7
Brain regions with significant differences between groups [15].
Figure 8
Figure 8
Brain regions with significant differences between groups on scale factors two, four, five, and six [133].

References

    1. Stern Y. Cognitive reserve in ageing and Alzheimer’s disease. Lancet Neurol. 2012;11:1006–1012. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(12)70191-6. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kumar A., Singh A. A review on Alzheimer’s disease pathophysiology and its management: An update. Pharmacol. Rep. 2015;67:195–203. doi: 10.1016/j.pharep.2014.09.004. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Takahashi R.H., Nagao T., Gouras G.K. Plaque formation and the intraneuronal accumulation of β-amyloid in Alzheimer’s disease. Pathol. Int. 2017;67:185–193. doi: 10.1111/pin.12520. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Thies W., Bleiler L. 2012 Alzheimer’s disease facts and figures. Alzheimer’s Dement. J. Alzheimer’s Assoc. 2012;8:131–168. doi: 10.1016/j.jalz.2012.02.001. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Buckley R.F., Villemagne V.L., Masters C.L., Ellis K.A., Rowe C.C., Johnson K., Sperling R., Amariglio R. A Conceptualization of the Utility of Subjective Cognitive Decline in Clinical Trials of Preclinical Alzheimer’s Disease. J. Mol. Neurosci. 2016;60:354–361. doi: 10.1007/s12031-016-0810-z. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources