Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 May 20;22(5):579.
doi: 10.3390/e22050579.

Wearable Inertial Sensors for Daily Activity Analysis Based on Adam Optimization and the Maximum Entropy Markov Model

Affiliations

Wearable Inertial Sensors for Daily Activity Analysis Based on Adam Optimization and the Maximum Entropy Markov Model

Sheikh Badar Ud Din Tahir et al. Entropy (Basel). .

Abstract

Advancements in wearable sensors technologies provide prominent effects in the daily life activities of humans. These wearable sensors are gaining more awareness in healthcare for the elderly to ensure their independent living and to improve their comfort. In this paper, we present a human activity recognition model that acquires signal data from motion node sensors including inertial sensors, i.e., gyroscopes and accelerometers. First, the inertial data is processed via multiple filters such as Savitzky-Golay, median and hampel filters to examine lower/upper cutoff frequency behaviors. Second, it extracts a multifused model for statistical, wavelet and binary features to maximize the occurrence of optimal feature values. Then, adaptive moment estimation (Adam) and AdaDelta are introduced in a feature optimization phase to adopt learning rate patterns. These optimized patterns are further processed by the maximum entropy Markov model (MEMM) for empirical expectation and highest entropy, which measure signal variances for outperformed accuracy results. Our model was experimentally evaluated on University of Southern California Human Activity Dataset (USC-HAD) as a benchmark dataset and on an Intelligent Mediasporting behavior (IMSB), which is a new self-annotated sports dataset. For evaluation, we used the "leave-one-out" cross validation scheme and the results outperformed existing well-known statistical state-of-the-art methods by achieving an improved recognition accuracy of 91.25%, 93.66% and 90.91% when compared with USC-HAD, IMSB, and Mhealth datasets, respectively. The proposed system should be applicable to man-machine interface domains, such as health exercises, robot learning, interactive games and pattern-based surveillance.

Keywords: Adam optimization; accelerometer and gyroscope sensors; inertial sensors; maximum entropy Markov model; multi-fused features.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow architecture of proposed human activity recognition model.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Signal Preprocessing. Inertial sensors with unfiltered (unprocessed) and filtered (processed) signals of correct walking activity via (a) Savitzky–Golay, (b) hampel and (c) median filters on the University of Southern California Human Activity Dataset (USC-HAD) dataset.
Figure 3
Figure 3
1D vector plot of statistical features of the walking forward activity log using the USC-HAD dataset.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Accelerometer signal representation via chirp z-transform of the walking forward signal.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Hilbert transform features depicted for x components of the walking forward signal.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Local binary pattern (LBP) applied using signal data. (a) Segment of inertial signal sample, (b) sample values of associate signal, (c) middle value Pc as threshold for associate values Po, P1, P2, …, P7 and (d) produced LBP code converted into decimal representation.
Figure 7
Figure 7
1-D Walsh–Hadamard transform (WHT) as (a) a WHT signal feature and (b) magnitude of WHT coefficients of the walking forward activity.
Figure 8
Figure 8
First order derivation representation of walking forward and jumping up activities using the USC-HAD dataset.
Figure 9
Figure 9
Adaptive moment estimation (Adam) optimization algorithms with adaptive learning of (a) walking forward and (b) running forward activities using the USC-HAD dataset.
Figure 10
Figure 10
AdaDelta optimization algorithm with adaptive learning of (a) elevator down and (b) elevator up activities using the USC-HAD dataset.
Figure 11
Figure 11
Maximum entropy Markov model algorithm applied to six different activities of the Intelligent Media sporting behavior (IMSB) dataset.
Figure 12
Figure 12
Sensors mounted on human body.
Figure 13
Figure 13
Signals representing wrist motion in badminton (left column) and table tennis (right column).
Figure 14
Figure 14
Signals representing feet movement in football (left column) and basketball (right column).

References

    1. Ranasinghe S., Machot F.A., Mayr H.C. A review on applications of activity recognition systems with regard to performance and evaluation. Int. J. Distrib. Sens. Netw. 2016;12:1–22. doi: 10.1177/1550147716665520. - DOI
    1. Mukhopadhyay S.C. Wearable sensors for human activity monitoring: A review. IEEE Sens. J. 2015;15:1321–1330. doi: 10.1109/JSEN.2014.2370945. - DOI
    1. Ahmed N., Rafiq J.I., Islam M.R. Enhanced Human Activity Recognition Based on Smartphone Sensor Data Using Hybrid Feature Selection Model. Sensors. 2020;20:317. doi: 10.3390/s20010317. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Susan S., Agrawal P., Mittal M., Bansal S. New shape descriptor in the context of edge continuity. CAAI Trans. Intell. Technol. 2019;4:101–109. doi: 10.1049/trit.2019.0002. - DOI
    1. Jalal A., Kim Y.-H., Kim Y.-J., Kamal S., Kim D. Robust human activity recognition from depth video using spatiotemporal multi-fused features. Pattern Recognit. 2017;61:295–308. doi: 10.1016/j.patcog.2016.08.003. - DOI

LinkOut - more resources