Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 May 25;22(5):590.
doi: 10.3390/e22050590.

Non-Linear Regression Modelling to Estimate the Global Warming Potential of a Newspaper

Affiliations

Non-Linear Regression Modelling to Estimate the Global Warming Potential of a Newspaper

Alexis Lozano et al. Entropy (Basel). .

Abstract

Technological innovations are not enough by themselves to achieve social and environmental sustainability in companies. Sustainable development aims to determine the environmental impact of a product and the hidden price of products and services through the concept of radical transparency. This means that companies should show and disclose the impact on the environment of any good or service. This way, the consumer can choose in a transparent manner, not only for the price. The use of the eco-label as a European eco-label, which bases its criteria on life cycle assessment, could provide an indicator of corporate social responsibility for a given product. However, it does not give a full guarantee that the product was obtained in a sustainable manner. The aim of this work is to provide a way of calculating the value of the environmental impacts of an industrial product, under different operating conditions, so that each company can provide detailed information on the impacts of its products, information that can form part of its "green product sheet". As a case study, the daily production of a newspaper, printed by coldset, has been chosen. Each process involved in production was configured with raw material and energy consumption information from production plants, manufacturer data and existing databases. Four non-linear regression models have been trained to estimate the impact of a newspaper's circulation from five input variables (pages, grammage, height, paper type, and print run) with 5508 data samples each. These non-linear regression models were trained using the Levenberg-Marquardt nonlinear least squares algorithm. The mean absolute percentage errors (MAPE) obtained by all the non-linear regression models tested were less than 5%. Through the proposed correlations, it is possible to obtain a score that reports on the impact of the product for different operating conditions and several types of raw materials. Ecolabelling can be further developed by incorporating a scoring system for the impact caused by the product or process, using a standardised impact methodology.

Keywords: correlation; ecolabeling; life cycle assessment; non-linear regression models.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript; or in the decision to publish the results.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Life cycle of a printed newspaper. Figure inspired in [14].
Figure 2
Figure 2
Flowchart of the main process units.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Representation of each individual variable against the impact. Individual behaviour of impacts vs. (a) number of pages; (b) grammage; (c) heights (d) paper types and (e) print run.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Method developed for testing each analysed model.
Figure 5
Figure 5
10-fold cross-validation applied to evaluate each model. (1) Data selection and cleaning; (2) data randomization by rows; (3) data division; (4) Cross-Validation; (5) Performance determination by metrics.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Average MAE metric results and standard deviations after 10-fold cross-validation.
Figure 7
Figure 7
Average MAPE metric results and standard deviations after 10-fold cross-validation.
Figure 8
Figure 8
Average R2 metric results and standard deviations after 10-fold cross-validation.
Figure 9
Figure 9
Values of observed impact data and impact data estimated by Model 4.

References

    1. Curran M.A. Encyclopedia of Ecology, Five-Volume Set. Elsevier Inc.; Philadelphia, PA, USA: 2008. Life-Cycle Assessment; pp. 2168–2174.
    1. Rack M., Valdivia S., Sonnemann G. Life Cycle Impact Assessment—Where we are, trends, and next steps: A late report from a UNEP/SETAC Life Cycle Initiative workshop and a few updates from recent developments. Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. 2013;18:1413–1420. doi: 10.1007/s11367-013-0569-1. - DOI
    1. Goleman D. Ecological Intelligence: How Knowing the Hidden Impacts of What We Buy Can Change Everything. Broadway Books; New York, NY, USA: 2009.
    1. Muralikrishna I.V., Manickam V. Environmental Management. Springer; Berlin, Germany: 2017. Environmental Management Life Cycle Assessment; pp. 57–75.
    1. Berger M., Finkbeiner M. Correlation analysis of life cycle impact assessment indicators measuring resource use. Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. 2011;16:74–81. doi: 10.1007/s11367-010-0237-7. - DOI