Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Observational Study
. 2020 Dec 7;20(1):318.
doi: 10.1186/s12893-020-00937-y.

Episodes of strain experienced in the operating room: impact of the type of surgery, the profession and the phase of the operation

Affiliations
Observational Study

Episodes of strain experienced in the operating room: impact of the type of surgery, the profession and the phase of the operation

Sandra Keller et al. BMC Surg. .

Abstract

Background: Strain episodes, defined as phases of higher workload, stress or negative emotions, occur everyday in the operating room (OR). Accurate knowledge of when strain is most intense for the different OR team members is imperative for developing appropriate interventions. The primary goal of the study was to investigate temporal patterns of strain across surgical phases for different professionals working in the OR, for different types of operations.

Methods: We developed a guided recall method to assess the experience of strain from the perspective of operating room (OR) team members. The guided recall was completed by surgeons, residents, anesthesiologists, circulating nurses and scrub technicians immediately after 113 operations, performed in 5 departments of one hospital in North America. We also conducted interviews with 16 surgeons on strain moments during their specific operation types. Strain experiences were related to surgical phases and compared across different operation types separately for each profession in the OR.

Results: We analyzed 693 guided recalls. General linear modeling (GLM) showed that strain varied across the phases of the operations (defined as before incision, first third, middle third and last third) [quadratic (F = 47.85, p < 0.001) and cubic (F = 8.94, p = 0.003) effects]. Phases of operations varied across professional groups [linear (F = 4.14, p = 0.001) and quadratic (F = 14.28, p < 0.001) effects] and surgery types [only cubic effects (F = 4.92, p = 0.001)]. Overall strain was similar across surgery types (F = 1.27, p = 0.28). Surgeons reported generally more strain episodes during the first and second third of the operations; except in vascular operations, where no phase was associated with significantly higher strain levels, and emergency/trauma surgery, where strain episodes occurred primarily during the first third of the operation. Other professional groups showed different strain time patterns.

Conclusions: Members of the OR teams experience strain differently across the phases of an operation. Thus, phases with high concentration requirements may highly vary across OR team members and no single phase of an operation can be defined as a "sterile cockpit" phase for all team members.

Keywords: Anesthetist; Circulating nurse; Operating room; Phase; Scrub technician; Strain; Stress; Student; Surgeon; Tension.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Guided recall tool to measure strain during operations and examples of strain episodes
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Mean frequency of strain events reported during the four phases of the operations. Note: x-axis: 1 = Phase 1, before incision, 2 = Phase 2, begin (first third of the operation), 3 = Phase 3, middle (middle third of the operation), 4 = Phase 4, end (last third of the operation); y-axis: scale representing mean frequency of strain episodes reported by the participants
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Graphical representation of the strain phases mentioned by surgeons from different surgical specialties in interviews

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Dias RD, Ngo-Howard MC, Boskovski MT, Zenati MA, Yule SJ. Systematic review of measurement tools to assess surgeons' intraoperative cognitive workload. Br J Surg. 2018;105(5):491–501. doi: 10.1002/bjs.10795. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lingard L, Reznick R, Espin S, Regehr G, DeVito I. Team communications in the operating room: talk patterns, sites of tension, and implications for novices. Acad Med. 2002;77(3):232–237. doi: 10.1097/00001888-200203000-00013. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Keller S, Tschan F, Semmer NK, Timm-Holzer E, Zimmermann J, Candinas D, Demartines N, Hübner M, Beldi G. “Disruptive behavior” in the operating room: a prospective observational study of triggers and effects of tense communication episodes in surgical teams. PLoS ONE. 2019;14(12):e0226437. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0226437. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Booij LH. Conflicts in the operating theatre. Curr Opin Anesthesiol. 2007;20(2):152–156. doi: 10.1097/ACO.0b013e32809f9506. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Carayon P, Zijlstra F. Relationship between job control, work pressure and strain: Studies in the USA and in The Netherlands. Work & Stress. 1999;13(1):32–48. doi: 10.1080/026783799296174. - DOI

Publication types