Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Dec 7;21(1):1002.
doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04921-y.

Randomized controlled multicentre study of albumin replacement therapy in septic shock (ARISS): protocol for a randomized controlled trial

Collaborators, Affiliations

Randomized controlled multicentre study of albumin replacement therapy in septic shock (ARISS): protocol for a randomized controlled trial

Yasser Sakr et al. Trials. .

Abstract

Background: Albumin is a key regulator of fluid distribution within the extracellular space and has several properties beyond its oncotic activity. The accumulating evidence suggests that supplementation of albumin may provide survival advantages only when the insult is severe as in patients with septic shock.

Methods/design: The randomized controlled multicentre study of albumin replacement therapy in septic shock (ARISS) investigates whether the replacement with albumin and the maintenance of its serum levels of at least 30 g/l for 28 days improve survival in patients with septic shock compared to resuscitation and volume maintenance without albumin. Adult patients (≥ 18 years) with septic shock are randomly assigned within a maximum of 24 h after the onset of septic shock after obtaining informed consents to treatment or control groups. Patients assigned to the treatment group receive a 60-g loading dose of human albumin 20% over 2-3 h. Serum albumin levels are maintained at least at 30 g/l in the ICU for a maximum of 28 days following randomization using 40-80 g human albumin 20% infusion. The control group is treated according to the usual practice with crystalloids as the first choice for the resuscitation and maintenance phase of septic shock. The primary endpoint is 90 days mortality and secondary endpoints include 28-day, 60-day, ICU, and in-hospital mortality, organ dysfunction/failure, total amount of fluid administration and total fluid balance in the ICU, and lengths of ICU and hospital stay. In total, 1412 patients need to be analysed, 706 per group. For the sample size estimation, a 15% reduction in 90-day mortality is assumed, i.e. an absolute reduction of 7.5% points to 42.5% (relative risk 1.18). Assuming a dropout rate of 15%, a total of 1662 patients need to be allocated.

Discussion: The results of the clinical trial may influence the treatment of patients with septic shock. The expected improvement in patient survival may result in a reduction in the resources currently used in the treatment of these patients and in the socioeconomic burden of this disease.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03869385 . Registration on 18 July 2019. Protocol version: Final 3.0.

Keywords: Albumin; Fluid resuscitation; Septic shock.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

S. Kluge received research support by Ambu, E.T.View Ltd., Fisher & Paykel, Pfizer, and Xenios. He also received lecture honorarium from Arjo Huntleigh, Astellas, Astra, Basilea, Bard, Baxter, Biotest, CSL Behring, Cytosorbents, Fresenius, Gilead, MSD, Orion, Pfizer, Philips, Sedana, Sorin, Xenios, and Zoll. He received consultant honorarium from AMOMED, Astellas, Baxter, Bayer, Fresenius, Gilead, MSD, Pfizer, and Xenios. Y Sakr received consultation and lecture honorarium from Grifols S.A., in addition to the support supplied for the current trial. All other others declare that they do not have conflict of interest in relation to the subject of the current manuscript.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Flow chart representing the study interventions. SAPS, Simplified Acute Physiology Score; SOFA, Sequential Organ Failure Assessment
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Schedule of the trial visits and study procedures. 1After obtaining informed consent. 2Basic data: sex, age, weight, height, time of hospital admission, time of intensive care unit (ICU) admission, type of admission, referring facility prior to ICU admission, etc. from the 24-h period before randomization (data from ICU or normal ward). 3Albumin group: determination of serum albumin concentration before administration of the starting dose of the trial drug. 4Body temperature, respiratory rate, and haemodynamic parameters. 5Catecholamines, inotropic agents, diuretics, volume replacement therapy, including blood transfusion, adjunctive sepsis therapy. 6Recording of concomitant medication with catecholamines and inotropes at the corresponding time point (+/− 1 h); recording of concomitant medication with diuretics, volume therapeutics including transfusion therapy, adjunctive sepsis therapy of the previous 6 h. 7Haemoglobin, creatinine, bilirubin, C-reactive protein, procalcitonin, leucocytes, platelets, lactate, arterial blood gas analysis. 824-h time period prior to randomization. 9Procedures, mechanical ventilation, haemodynamic monitoring. 10If adverse events (AEs) or serious adverse events (SAEs) are still “ongoing” after the end of treatment with the trial drug, observation will continue until the end of data collection (day 90). 11Data on the vital status (alive/dead), if applicable date of death and cause of death, residence after discharge, if applicable, recording of “End of Life” decisions

References

    1. Martin GS, et al. The epidemiology of sepsis in the United States from 1979 through 2000. N Engl J Med. 2003;348(16):1546–1554. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa022139. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Vincent JL, et al. Assessment of the worldwide burden of critical illness: the intensive care over nations (ICON) audit. Lancet Respir Med. 2014;2(5):380–386. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(14)70061-X. - DOI - PubMed
    1. SepNet Critical Care Trials, G Incidence of severe sepsis and septic shock in German intensive care units: the prospective, multicentre INSEP study. Intensive Care Med. 2016;42(12):1980–1989. doi: 10.1007/s00134-016-4504-3. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Holst LB, et al. Lower versus higher hemoglobin threshold for transfusion in septic shock. N Engl J Med. 2014;371(15):1381–1391. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1406617. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Mouncey PR, et al. Trial of early, goal-directed resuscitation for septic shock. N Engl J Med. 2015;372(14):1301–1311. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1500896. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

Associated data