Revisiting Evaluation of Multiple Sequence Alignment Methods
- PMID: 33289899
- DOI: 10.1007/978-1-0716-1036-7_17
Revisiting Evaluation of Multiple Sequence Alignment Methods
Abstract
Multiple sequence alignment is a core first step in many bioinformatics analyses, and errors in these alignments can have negative consequences for scientific studies. In this article, we review some of the recent literature evaluating multiple sequence alignment methods and identify specific challenges that arise when performing these evaluations. In particular, we discuss the different trends observed in simulation studies and when using biological benchmarks. Overall, we find that multiple sequence alignment, far from being a "solved problem," would benefit from new attention.
Keywords: Model misspecification; Multiple sequence alignment; Phylogeny estimation; Statistical alignment; Structural alignment.
References
-
- Morrison D, Ellis JT (1997) Effects of nucleotide sequence alignment on phylogeny estimation: a case study of 18S rDNAs of apicomplexa. Mol Biol Evol 14:428–441 - PubMed
-
- Hall B (2005) Comparison of the accuracies of several phylogenetic methods using protein and DNA sequences. Mol Biol Evol 22:792–802 - PubMed
-
- Ogden T, Rosenberg M (2006) Multiple sequence alignment accuracy and phylogenetic inference. System Biol 55(2):314–328
-
- Liu K, Raghavan S, Nelesen S, Linder CR, Warnow T (2009) Rapid and accurate large-scale coestimation of sequence alignments and phylogenetic trees. Science 324(5934):1561–1564 - PubMed
-
- Wang L-S, Leebens-Mack J, Wall PK, Beckmann K, dePamphilis CW, Warnow T (2011) The impact of multiple protein sequence alignment on phylogenetic estimation. IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform 8(4):1108–1119 - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
