Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2020 Dec 8;15(12):e0239927.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0239927. eCollection 2020.

Impact of knowledge and attitude on the utilization rate of cervical cancer screening tests among Ethiopian women: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Impact of knowledge and attitude on the utilization rate of cervical cancer screening tests among Ethiopian women: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Ayelign Mengesha Kassie et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Introduction: Cervical cancer is a major public health problem, particularly in resource-limited settings. The use of vaccination and screening tests has reduced the burden of cervical cancer in developed countries. However, the situation is quite the reverse in developing countries, including Ethiopia. Hence, this study aimed to estimate the pooled impact of knowledge and attitude on the prevalence of cervical cancer screening service utilization rates among Ethiopian women.

Methods: Studies that examined cervical cancer screening service utilization among women in Ethiopia were searched from five international databases. Cochran's Q chi-square and the I-squared test statistics were used to check the presence of heterogeneity among the included studies. The funnel plot and Egger's regression tests were also used to assess the presence of publication bias. A weighted DerSimonian and Laird random-effects model was employed. Subgroup analysis was performed by the study population concerning the prevalence of cervical cancer screening service utilization rates. Sensitivity analysis was also conducted to assess the effect of a single study on the pooled estimates. Data analysis was performed using STATA™ Version 14 software.

Results: A total of 44 studies with 28,186 study participants were included. The estimated pooled prevalence of cervical cancer screening service utilization was 8.11% (95% CI: 7.26, 8.97). After adjustment for publication bias with the trim and fill analysis, the estimated prevalence rate appeared to be 5.47% (95% CI: 4.66, 6.28). The prevalence of cervical cancer screening service utilization was higher among HIV-positive women, 16.85%, and in studies conducted among health care workers, 10.24%, than the general population. The pooled effect of knowledge on the utilization of cervical cancer screening tests among Ethiopian women was statistically significant (AOR = 3.20, 95% CI: 1.63, 6.31). Similarly, the pooled estimated odds of utilizing cervical cancer screening tests were 6.1 times higher (AOR = 6.09, 95% CI: 1.09, 34.36) among women who had a favorable attitude towards the screening tests.

Conclusion: Knowledge and attitude had a significant impact on the prevalence of cervical cancer screening test utilization rates among women in Ethiopia. However, the prevalence of cervical cancer screening service utilization among Ethiopian women is very low. Hence, large-scale awareness programs and situation-based strategies need to be designed to increase the uptake of cervical cancer screening services in the country.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. PRISMA flow chart of study selection for the prevalence of cervical cancer screening service utilization in Ethiopia.
Fig 2
Fig 2. Forest plot for the prevalence of cervical cancer screening service utilization.
Fig 3
Fig 3. Subgroup analysis by the study population.
Fig 4
Fig 4. Results of the sensitivity analysis of the 42 studies in the meta-analysis.
Fig 5
Fig 5. Trim and fill analysis for the prevalence of cervical cancer screening service utilization.
Fig 6
Fig 6. The pooled effect of knowledge on cervical cancer screening service utilization.
Egger’s regression test also showed that there was no publication bias for the studies included to estimate the pooled effect of knowledge on cervical cancer screening service utilization among women (P = 0.062).
Fig 7
Fig 7. The pooled effect of attitude on cervical cancer screening service utilization.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Luciani S, Cabanes A, Prieto-Lara E, Gawryszewski V. Cervical and female breast cancers in the Americas: current situation and opportunities for action. Bulletin of the world health organization. 2013;91:640–9. 10.2471/BLT.12.116699 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Forouzanfar MH, Foreman KJ, Delossantos AM, Lozano R, Lopez AD, Murray CJ, et al. Breast and cervical cancer in 187 countries between 1980 and 2010: a systematic analysis. The lancet. 2011;378(9801):1461–84. 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)61351-2 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Torre LA, Bray F, Siegel RL, Ferlay J, Lortet‐Tieulent J, Jemal A. Global cancer statistics, 2012. CA: a cancer journal for clinicians. 2015;65(2):87–108. 10.3322/caac.21262 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bray F, Jemal A, Grey N, Ferlay J, Forman D. Global cancer transitions according to the Human Development Index (2008–2030): a population-based study. The lancet oncology. 2012;13(8):790–801. 10.1016/S1470-2045(12)70211-5 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Tota J, Ramana–Kumar A, El-Khatib Z, Franco E. The road ahead for cervical cancer prevention and control. Current oncology. 2014;21(2):e255 10.3747/co.21.1720 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

MeSH terms