The Recovery Benefit on Skin Blood Flow Using Vibrating Foam Rollers for Postexercise Muscle Fatigue in Runners
- PMID: 33291311
- PMCID: PMC7730244
- DOI: 10.3390/ijerph17239118
The Recovery Benefit on Skin Blood Flow Using Vibrating Foam Rollers for Postexercise Muscle Fatigue in Runners
Abstract
Purpose: To determine the effect of vibrating rollers on skin blood flow after running for recovery from muscle fatigue.
Method: 23 healthy runners, aged between 20 to 45 years, participated in a crossover trial. Muscle fatigue was induced by running, and recovery using a vibrating roller was determined before and after the intervention. Each subject was measured at three time points (prerun, postrun, and postroller) to compare skin blood flow perfusion and blood flow oscillation at the midpoint of the dominant gastrocnemius muscle. The results show that blood perfusion is greater when a vibrating roller is used than a foam roller, but there is no statistical difference. The analysis of blood flow oscillation shows that vibrating rollers induce 30% greater endothelial activation than a foam roller. Vibrating rollers significantly stimulate the characteristic frequency for myogenic activation (p < 0.05); however, the effect size is conservative.
Keywords: blood flow oscillation; recovery of muscle fatigue; skin blood flow; vibrating roller.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Figures







Similar articles
-
Roller massage: Comparison of three different surface type pattern foam rollers on passive knee range of motion and pain perception.J Bodyw Mov Ther. 2019 Jul;23(3):555-560. doi: 10.1016/j.jbmt.2019.05.002. Epub 2019 May 8. J Bodyw Mov Ther. 2019. PMID: 31563369 Clinical Trial.
-
Cross transfer acute effects of foam rolling with vibration on ankle dorsiflexion range of motion.J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact. 2018 Jun 1;18(2):262-267. J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact. 2018. PMID: 29855449 Free PMC article.
-
COMPARISON OF THREE DIFFERENT DENSITY TYPE FOAM ROLLERS ON KNEE RANGE OF MOTION AND PRESSURE PAIN THRESHOLD: A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL.Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2018 Jun;13(3):474-482. Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2018. PMID: 30038833 Free PMC article.
-
Self-Mobilization Using a Foam Roller Versus a Roller Massager: Which Is More Effective for Increasing Hamstrings Flexibility?J Sport Rehabil. 2017 Jan;26(1):94-100. doi: 10.1123/jsr.2015-0035. Epub 2016 Aug 24. J Sport Rehabil. 2017. PMID: 27632826 Review.
-
A Meta-Analysis of the Effects of Foam Rolling on Performance and Recovery.Front Physiol. 2019 Apr 9;10:376. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2019.00376. eCollection 2019. Front Physiol. 2019. PMID: 31024339 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Effects of Vibration Foam Rolling on Pain, Fatigue, and Range of Motion in Individuals with Muscle Fatigue: A Systematic Review.Healthcare (Basel). 2025 Jun 11;13(12):1391. doi: 10.3390/healthcare13121391. Healthcare (Basel). 2025. PMID: 40565417 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Does Vibration Foam Roller Influence Performance and Recovery? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Sports Med Open. 2022 Mar 4;8(1):32. doi: 10.1186/s40798-022-00421-2. Sports Med Open. 2022. PMID: 35244802 Free PMC article.
-
Comparing The Effectiveness of 10-Minute Dynamic Stretching, Vibration Rolling, and Climbing-Specific Warm-Ups on Exercise Performances in Rock Climbers.J Sports Sci Med. 2025 Mar 1;24(1):84-92. doi: 10.52082/jssm.2025.84. eCollection 2025 Mar. J Sports Sci Med. 2025. PMID: 40046228 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Effect of vibration foam rolling on the range of motion in healthy adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis.J Exerc Rehabil. 2021 Aug 23;17(4):226-233. doi: 10.12965/jer.2142322.161. eCollection 2021 Aug. J Exerc Rehabil. 2021. PMID: 34527633 Free PMC article. Review.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources