Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Dec 4;10(12):2293.
doi: 10.3390/ani10122293.

Tetrazolium Salt WST-8 as a Novel and Reliable Chromogenic Indicator for the Assessment of Boar Semen Quality

Affiliations

Tetrazolium Salt WST-8 as a Novel and Reliable Chromogenic Indicator for the Assessment of Boar Semen Quality

Yu-Hsin Chen et al. Animals (Basel). .

Abstract

A tetrazolium salt, 2-[2-methoxy-4-nitrophenyl]-3-[4-nitrophenyl]-5-[2,4-disulfophenyl]-2H-tetrazolium (WST-8), has been used widely to determine cell viability; however, its application in the field of reproduction is still limited due to this assay merely providing information regarding cell viability. The aim of this study was to correlate the WST-8 reduction rate with various sperm quality-related parameters (i.e., sperm viability, motility, progressive motility, acrosome integrity and mitochondria integrity) in order to provide a rapid, reliable and affordable assessment for boar semen quality evaluation. Using different ratios of active/damaged sperm cells, we first validated our sample preparations by standard flow cytometry and computer-assisted sperm analysis. Further analyses demonstrated that the most efficient experimental condition for obtaining a reliable prediction model was when sperm concentration reached 300 × 106 cells/mL with the semen/cell-counting kit-8 (CCK-8®) ratio of 200/10 and incubated time of 20 min. Under this set up, the WST-8 reduction rate (differences on optic density reading value, ΔOD at 450 nm) and sperm parameters were highly correlated (p < 0.01) for all sperm parameters evaluated. In the case of limited semen samples, a minimal semen concentration at 150 × 106 cells/mL with the semen/CCK-8® ratio of 200/20 and incubation time for 30 min could still provide reliable prediction of sperm parameters using the WST-8 assay. Our data provide strong evidence for the first time that the WST-8 assay could be used to evaluate boar semen quality with great potential to be applied to different mammalian species.

Keywords: WST-8; boar; computer-assisted sperm analysis (CASA); flow cytometry; semen quality.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Linear regression and prediction models for sperm concentration of 300 × 106 cells/mL. Prediction model and formula between the WST-8 reduction rate (ΔOD) and boar sperm viability (%), sperm motility (%), progressive sperm (%), acrosome integrity (%) and mitochondrial integrity (%), at a sperm concentration of 300 × 106 cells/mL after 10 min incubation at 37 °C with a semen/CCK-8® ratio of 200/10.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Linear regression and prediction models for sperm concentration of 150 × 106 cells/mL. Prediction model and formula between the WST-8 reduction rate (ΔOD) and boar sperm viability (%), sperm motility (%), progressive sperm (%), acrosome integrity (%) and mitochondrial integrity (%), at a sperm concentration of 150 × 106 cells/mL after 30 min incubation at 37 °C with a semen/CCK-8® ratio of 200/20.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Knox R.V. Artificial insemination in pigs today. Theriogenology. 2016;85:83–93. doi: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2015.07.009. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Barbarosie C., Agarwal A., Henkel R. Diagnostic value of advanced semen analysis in evaluation of male infertility. Andrologia. 2020:e13625. doi: 10.1111/and.13625. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Love C.C. Modern Techniques for Semen Evaluation. Vet. Clin. N. Am. Equine Pract. 2016;32:531–546. doi: 10.1016/j.cveq.2016.07.006. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Moce E., Graham J.K. In vitro evaluation of sperm quality. Anim. Reprod. Sci. 2008;105:104–118. doi: 10.1016/j.anireprosci.2007.11.016. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Sutovsky P. New Approaches to Boar Semen Evaluation, Processing and Improvement. Reprod. Domest. Anim. 2015;50(Suppl. 2):11–19. doi: 10.1111/rda.12554. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources