Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021 Mar;25(3):177-186.
doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2020.11.008. Epub 2020 Nov 26.

What Role Does Pathogen-Avoidance Psychology Play in Pandemics?

Affiliations
Review

What Role Does Pathogen-Avoidance Psychology Play in Pandemics?

Joshua M Ackerman et al. Trends Cogn Sci. 2021 Mar.

Abstract

A substantial body of research has illuminated psychological adaptations motivating pathogen avoidance, mechanisms collectively known as the behavioral immune system. Can knowledge about these mechanisms inform how people respond to widespread disease outbreaks, such as the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) [coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)] pandemic? We review evidence suggesting that the evolutionary history of the behavioral immune system, and the cues that activate it, are distinct in many ways from modern human experiences with pandemics. Moreover, the behaviors engaged by this system may have limited utility for combating pandemic diseases like COVID-19. A better understanding of the points of distinction and points of overlap between our evolved pathogen-avoidance psychology and responses to pandemics may help us realize a more precise and intervention-ready science.

Keywords: behavioral immune system; evolution; health; infectious disease; social psychology.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Key Features of Ancestral and Modern Contexts for Infectious Disease Spread.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Mismatches between Pathogen-Avoidance Responses and Respiratory Pandemic Factors.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Betsch C. Monitoring behavioural insights related to COVID-19. Lancet. 2020;395:1255–1256. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Wang C. Immediate psychological responses and associated factors during the initial stage of the 2019 coronavirus disease (COVID-19) epidemic among the general population in China. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health. 2020;17:1729. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Zhang J. The differential psychological distress of populations affected by the COVID-19 pandemic. Brain Behav. Immun. 2020;87:49–50. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Van Bavel J.J. Using social and behavioural science to support COVID-19 pandemic response. Nat. Hum. Behav. 2020;4:460–471. - PubMed
    1. Samore T. Of pathogens and party lines: social conservatism positively associates with COVID-19 precautions among Democrats but not Republicans. PsyArXiv. 2020 doi: 10.31234/osf.io/9zsvb. Published online August 8, 2020. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

MeSH terms