Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2020 Sep 2;37(Suppl 1):2.
doi: 10.11604/pamj.supp.2020.37.2.25183. eCollection 2020.

Social approaches to COVID-19 pandemic response: effectiveness and practicality in sub-Saharan Africa

Affiliations
Review

Social approaches to COVID-19 pandemic response: effectiveness and practicality in sub-Saharan Africa

Uchenna Anderson Amaechi et al. Pan Afr Med J. .

Abstract

Introduction: the threat of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic to health systems and communities in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) is enormous. Social approaches such as distancing measures are essential components of the public health response to respiratory-related infectious disease outbreaks. Due to socio-economic and broader peculiarities of SSA countries, social approaches that were effective elsewhere may have limited practicality in these contexts, and if practical; may yield different or even adverse results. We highlighted the effectiveness of these social approaches and their practicality in SSA.

Methods: we conducted a comprehensive literature search through multiple databases, to identify articles relevant to social distancing. Findings were thematically summarized.

Results: our review found emerging and varying empirical evidence on the effectiveness of social approaches in the control and mitigation of the COVID-19 pandemic; thus, limiting its applicability in SSA contexts. Nonetheless, our review demonstrates that the effectiveness and practicality of social approaches in SSA contexts will depend on available resources; timing, duration, and intensity of the intervention; and compliance. Weak political coordination, anti-science sentiments, distrust of political leaders and limited implementation of legal frameworks can also affect practicality.

Conclusion: to overcome these challenges, tailoring and adaptation of these measures to different but unique contexts for maximum effectiveness, and investment in social insurance mechanisms, are vital.

Keywords: Social distancing; community mitigation; mass gathering; non-pharmaceutical intervention; school; workplace.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests

References

    1. World Health Organisation (WHO) Modes of transmission of virus causing COVID-19: Implications for IPC precaution recommendations. 2020 Mar 29; Accessed March 29 2020.
    1. Pearce Katie. What is social distancing and how can it slow the spread of COVID-19? The Hub. Johns Hopkins University. Archived from the original on 2020-03-29.
    1. Kinlaw Kathy, Drue H Barrett, Levine Robert J. Ethical guidelines in Pandemic Influenza-Recommendations of the Ethics Subcommittee of the Advisory Committee to the Director. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention - PubMed
    1. World Health Organisation. Non-pharmaceutical public health measures for mitigating the risk and impact of epidemic and pandemic influenza. Accessed March 29 2020.
    1. Massinga Loembé M, Tshangela A, Salyer SJ, Jay K Varma JK, Ahmed E Ogwell Ouma AE, Nkengasong JN. COVID-19 in Africa: the spread and response. Nat Med. 2020 Jul;26(7):999–1003. - PubMed