Nonselective versus selective His bundle pacing: An acute intrapatient speckle-tracking strain echocardiographic study
- PMID: 33296523
- DOI: 10.1111/jce.14834
Nonselective versus selective His bundle pacing: An acute intrapatient speckle-tracking strain echocardiographic study
Abstract
Introduction: We aimed to compare the acute differences in left ventricular (LV) function and mechanical synchrony during nonselective His bundle pacing (ns-HBP) versus selective His bundle pacing (s-HBP) using strain echocardiography.
Methods and results: Consecutive patients with permanent His bundle pacing, in whom it was possible to obtain both s-HBP and ns-HBP, were studied in two centers. In each patient, echocardiography was performed sequentially during s-HBP and ns-HBP. Speckle-tracking echocardiography parameters were analyzed: Global longitudinal strain (GLS), the time delay between peak systolic strain in the basal septal and basal lateral segments (BS-BL delay), peak strain dispersion (PSD) and strain delay index. Right ventricle function was assessed using tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE) and tissue Doppler velocity of the lateral tricuspid annulus (S'). A total of 69 patients (age: 75.6 ± 10.5 years; males: 75%) were enrolled. There were no differences in LV ejection fraction and GLS between s-HBP and ns-HBP modes: 59% versus 60%, and -15.6% versus -15.7%, respectively; as well as no difference in BS-BL delay and strain delay index. The PSD value was higher in the ns-HBP group than in the s-HBP group with the most pronounced difference in the basal LV segments. No differences in right ventricular function parameters (TAPSE and S') were found.
Conclusion: The ns-HBP and s-HBP modes seem comparable regarding ventricular function. The dyssynchrony parameters were significantly higher during ns-HBP, however, the difference seems modest and clarification of its impact on LV function requires a larger long-term study.
Keywords: dyssynchrony; left ventricular function; nonselective His bundle pacing; selective His bundle pacing; speckle strain echocardiography.
© 2020 Wiley Periodicals LLC.
Comment in
-
Do we need to pace the bundle? Editorial comment on: Nonselective versus selective His bundle pacing: An acute intrapatient speckle tracking strain echocardiographic study by Bednarek et al.J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2021 Jan;32(1):126-128. doi: 10.1111/jce.14832. Epub 2020 Dec 16. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2021. PMID: 33290636 No abstract available.
-
"Selective" or "exclusive" His bundle capture.J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2021 Sep;32(9):2609. doi: 10.1111/jce.15165. Epub 2021 Jul 19. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2021. PMID: 34288229 No abstract available.
References
REFERENCES
-
- Vijayaraman P, Dandamudi G, Zanon F, et al. Permanent His bundle pacing:recommendations from a Multicenter His Bundle Pacing Collaborative Working Group for standardization of definitions, implant measurements, and follow-up. Heart Rhythm. 2018;15(3):460-468.
-
- Tomaske M, Janousek J, Razek V, et al. Adverse effects of Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome with right septal or posteroseptal accessory pathways on cardiac function. Europace. 2008;10(2):181-189.
-
- Dai C, Guo B, Li W, et al. The effect of ventricular pre-excitation on ventricular wall motion and left ventricular systolic function. Europace. 2018;20(7):1175-1181.
-
- Salvo GD, Pergola V, Fadel B, Bulbul ZA, Caso P. Strain echocardiography and myocardial mechanics: from basics to clinical applications. J Cardiovasc Echogr. 2015;25(1):1-8.
-
- Zweerink A, van Everdingen WM, Nijveldt R, et al. Strain imaging to predict response to cardiac resynchronization therapy: a systematic comparison of strain parameters using multiple imaging techniques. ESC Heart Fail. 2018;5(6):1130-1140.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous