Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Dec 7;10(12):950.
doi: 10.3390/brainsci10120950.

Parental Education, Household Income, Race, and Children's Working Memory: Complexity of the Effects

Golnoush Akhlaghipour  1 , Shervin Assari  2   3
Affiliations

Parental Education, Household Income, Race, and Children's Working Memory: Complexity of the Effects

Golnoush Akhlaghipour et al. Brain Sci. .

Abstract

Background. Considerable research has linked social determinants of health (SDoHs) such as race, parental education, and household income to school performance, and these effects may be in part due to working memory. However, a growing literature shows that these effects may be complex: while the effects of parental education may be diminished for Blacks than Whites, household income may explain such effects. Purpose. Considering race as sociological rather than a biological construct (race as a proxy of racism) and built on Minorities' Diminished Returns (MDRs), this study explored complexities of the effects of SDoHs on children's working memory. Methods. We borrowed data from the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development (ABCD) study. The total sample was 10,418, 9- and 10-year-old children. The independent variables were race, parental education, and household income. The primary outcome was working memory measured by the NIH Toolbox Card Sorting Test. Age, sex, ethnicity, and parental marital status were the covariates. To analyze the data, we used mixed-effect regression models. Results. High parental education and household income were associated with higher and Black race was associated with lower working memory. The association between high parental education but not household income was less pronounced for Black than White children. This differential effect of parental education on working memory was explained by household income. Conclusions. For American children, parental education generates unequal working memory, depending on race. This means parental education loses some of its expected effects for Black families. It also suggests that while White children with highly educated parents have the highest working memory, Black children report lower working memory, regardless of their parental education. This inequality is mainly because of differential income in highly educated White and Black families. This finding has significant public policy and economic implications and suggests we need to do far more than equalizing education to eliminate racial inequalities in children's cognitive outcomes. While there is a need for multilevel policies that reduce the effect of racism and social stratification for middle-class Black families, equalizing income may have more returns than equalizing education.

Keywords: memory; population groups; social determinants of health; socioeconomic position; socioeconomic status; working memory.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Testing our model’s assumptions: (a) distribution of our outcome, (b) residuals, and (c) quantiles.
Figure 1
Figure 1
Testing our model’s assumptions: (a) distribution of our outcome, (b) residuals, and (c) quantiles.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Parental education effects overall.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Income effects overall.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Parental education across groups.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Income effects across groups.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Baddeley A.D., Logie R.H. Working Memory: The Multiple-Component Model. Cambridge University Press; Cambridge, UK: 1999.
    1. Baddeley A.D., Hitch G. Psychology of Learning and Motivation. Volume 8. Elsevier; Amsterdam, The Netherlands: 1974. Working memory; pp. 47–89.
    1. Gathercole S.E., Baddeley A.D. Working Memory and Language. Psychology Press; New York, NY, USA: 2014.
    1. Braver T.S., Cohen J.D., Nystrom L.E., Jonides J., Smith E.E., Noll D.C. A parametric study of prefrontal cortex involvement in human working memory. Neuroimage. 1997;5:49–62. doi: 10.1006/nimg.1996.0247. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Vandenbroucke L., Verschueren K., Desoete A., Aunio P., Ghesquière P., Baeyens D. Crossing the bridge to elementary school: The development of children’s working memory components in relation to teacher-student relationships and academic achievement. Early Child. Res. Q. 2018;42:1–10. doi: 10.1016/j.ecresq.2017.08.004. - DOI

LinkOut - more resources