Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Dec;11(4):613-614.
doi: 10.1007/s13193-020-01093-8. Epub 2020 May 23.

Robotic Surgery-Safety and Effectiveness, in Comparison with Traditional Surgery, Present Context and Recent FDA Safety Warning

Kiran Kumar Boyina  1 , Saubhik Dasukil  2
Affiliations

Robotic Surgery-Safety and Effectiveness, in Comparison with Traditional Surgery, Present Context and Recent FDA Safety Warning

Kiran Kumar Boyina et al. Indian J Surg Oncol. 2020 Dec.
No abstract available

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Oliveira CM, Nguyen HT, Ferraz AR, Watters K, Rosman B, Rahbar R. Robotic surgery in otolaryngology and head and neck surgery: a review. Minim Invasive Surg. 2012;2012:286563. doi: 10.1155/2012/286563. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Zhao W, Liu C, Li S, et al. Safety and efficacy for robot-assisted versus open pancreaticoduodenectomy and distal pancreatectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Surg Oncol. 2018;27(3):468–478. doi: 10.1016/j.suronc.2018.06.001. - DOI - PubMed
    1. FDA In Brief: FDA cautions patients, providers about using robotically-assisted surgical devices for mastectomy and other cancer-related surgeries. [posted on 28–02-19] online accessed on 10–05-19. https://www.fda.gov/NewsEvents/Newsroom/FDAInBrief/ucm632278.htm
    1. Kim KH, Choi HG, Jung YH. Head and neck robotic surgery: pros and cons. Head Neck Oncol. 2013;5(3):26.
    1. Intuitive Surgical Annual report 2017- Intuitive Surgical, online accessed on 10–05-19. www.intuitivesurgical.com

LinkOut - more resources