Investigations and time trends in loop ileostomy reversals following anterior resections: a single Australian institution seven-years' experience
- PMID: 33300280
- DOI: 10.1111/ans.16483
Investigations and time trends in loop ileostomy reversals following anterior resections: a single Australian institution seven-years' experience
Abstract
Background: Currently no consensus exists regarding what pre-reversal investigations are required to assess integrity of the rectal anastomosis. The objective of this study was to compare pre-reversal assessments of anastomotic integrity and to evaluate trends that might have influenced timings for reversal.
Methods: From a prospectively maintained database, patients with colorectal cancer resections between March 2012 and October 2019 were identified. Patient characteristics, pre-reversal contrast enema and flexible sigmoidoscopy findings were recorded, and management of complications were recorded. Time-to-ileostomy reversal and time series for trends were analysed.
Results: There were 154 patients included. Pre-reversal contrast enema or sigmoidoscopy detected a possible stricture or leak at the rectal anastomotic site in 11% (15/132) and 15% (18/112), respectively. When both modalities were used there was concordance of 86.1% and a positive likelihood ratio of 5.73. Of 125 (81.2%) ileostomies reversed, the median time-to-reversal was 11.99 months; time series analysis over the 7-year period showed no significant trend for average patient-days from booking to reversal (P = 0.60). Cox regression modelling did not identify any influential risk factors for the times taken to reversal.
Conclusion: This study supports the use of both contrast enema and flexible sigmoidoscopy in the assessment of rectal anastomosis integrity. Most patients with complications can have their ileostomies reversed. Patients who have adjuvant chemotherapy have a prolonged time to reversal.
Keywords: contrast enema; ileostomy reversal; sigmoidoscopy; time trend.
© 2020 Royal Australasian College of Surgeons.
References
-
- Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. Colorectal and Other Digestive-Tract Cancers. Cancer Series No.114. Cat. no. CAN117. Canberra: Australian Institute of Health and Welfare, 2018.
-
- Robertson J, Linkhorn H, Vather R, Jaung R, Bissett IP. Cost analysis of early versus delayed loop ileostomy closure: a case-matched study. Dig. Surg. 2015; 32: 166-72.
-
- Habib K, Gupta A, White D, Mazari FA, Wilson TR. Utility of contrast enema to assess anastomotic integrity and the natural history of radiological leaks after low rectal surgery: systematic review and meta-analysis. Int. J. Colorectal Dis. 2015; 30: 1007-14.
-
- Katory M, McLean R, Osman K et al. The novel appearance of low rectal anastomosis on contrast enema following laparoscopic anterior resection: discriminating anastomotic leaks from ‘dog-ears’ on water-soluble contrast enema and flexible sigmoidoscopy. Abdom. Radiol. 2017; 42: 435-41.
-
- Goh HL, Hawkins L, Kamarajah SK, Karandikar S, Goldstein M. Is water-soluble contrast enema examination for integrity of rectal anastomosis necessary prior to ileostomy reversal? J. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2020; 4: 417-21.
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
