Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Mar;60(1):77-98.
doi: 10.1111/bjc.12272. Epub 2020 Dec 10.

Using supervised machine learning on neuropsychological data to distinguish OCD patients with and without sensory phenomena from healthy controls

Affiliations

Using supervised machine learning on neuropsychological data to distinguish OCD patients with and without sensory phenomena from healthy controls

Caitlin A Stamatis et al. Br J Clin Psychol. 2021 Mar.

Abstract

Objectives: While theoretical models link obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) with executive function deficits, empirical findings from the neuropsychological literature remain mixed. These inconsistencies are likely exacerbated by the challenge of high-dimensional data (i.e., many variables per subject), which is common across neuropsychological paradigms and necessitates analytical advances. More unique to OCD is the heterogeneity of symptom presentations, each of which may relate to distinct neuropsychological features. While researchers have traditionally attempted to account for this heterogeneity using a symptom-based approach, an alternative involves focusing on underlying symptom motivations. Although the most studied symptom motivation involves fear of harmful events, 60-70% of patients also experience sensory phenomena, consisting of uncomfortable sensations or perceptions that drive compulsions. Sensory phenomena have received limited attention in the neuropsychological literature, despite evidence that symptoms motivated by these experiences may relate to distinct cognitive processes.

Methods: Here, we used a supervised machine learning approach to characterize neuropsychological processes in OCD, accounting for sensory phenomena.

Results: Compared to logistic regression and other algorithms, random forest best differentiated healthy controls (n = 59; balanced accuracy = .70), patients with sensory phenomena (n = 29; balanced accuracy = .59), and patients without sensory phenomena (n = 46; balanced accuracy = .62). Decision-making best distinguished between groups based on sensory phenomena, and among the patient subsample, those without sensory phenomena uniquely displayed greater risk sensitivity compared to healthy controls (d = .07, p = .008).

Conclusions: Results suggest that different cognitive profiles may characterize patients motivated by distinct drives. The superior performance and generalizability of the newer algorithms highlights the utility of considering multiple analytic approaches when faced with complex data.

Practitioner points: Practitioners should be aware that sensory phenomena are common experiences among patients with OCD. OCD patients with sensory phenomena may be distinguished from those without based on neuropsychological processes.

Keywords: executive function; machine learning; neuropsychology; obsessive-compulsive disorder; sensory phenomena.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Abramovitch, A., Abramowitz, J.S., & Mittelman, A. (2013). The neuropsychology of adult obsessive-compulsive disorder: A meta-analysis. Clinical Psychology Review, 33, 1163-1171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2013.09.004
    1. Abramovitch, A., & Cooperman, A. (2015). The cognitive neuropsychology of obsessive-compulsive disorder: A critical review. Journal of Obsessive-Compulsive and Related Disorders, 5, 24-36.
    1. Abramovitch, A., Dar, R., Hermesh, H., & Schweiger, A. (2012). Comparative neuropsychology of adult obsessive-compulsive disorder and attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder: Implications for a novel executive overload model of OCD. Journal of Neuropsychology, 6, 161-191.
    1. Abramowitz, J.S., & Jacoby, R.J. (2015). Obsessive-compulsive and related disorders: A critical review of the new diagnostic class. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 11, 165-186. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-032813-153713
    1. Agne, N.A., Tisott, C.G., Ballester, P., Passos, I.C., & Ferrão, Y.A. (2020). Predictors of suicide attempt in patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder: An exploratory study with machine learning analysis. Psychological Medicine, 16, 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291720002329

LinkOut - more resources