Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Jun;11(2):116-123.
doi: 10.1002/cap.10140. Epub 2021 Jan 3.

Minimally Invasive Surgical Strategies in Regenerative/Reconstructive Periodontal Therapy

Affiliations

Minimally Invasive Surgical Strategies in Regenerative/Reconstructive Periodontal Therapy

Giovanni Barbagallo et al. Clin Adv Periodontics. 2021 Jun.

Abstract

Focused clinical question: After a quick overview on the original principles of guided periodontal regeneration (GTR), the aim of this paper focuses on the advantages of minimally invasive surgical techniques for periodontal regeneration/reconstruction. The specific clinical question to answer is: Are there new clinical parameters useful to choose the best minimal invasive surgery approach for each periodontal defect? An update of the decision trees is to propose after highlighting some clinical parameters deemed relevant for the choice of the most suitable minimally invasive surgical approach and which therefore are considered by us having a place in the new decision trees.

Summary: Starting from the paper of Evian dated 1985 until that of Aslan in 2017, we have analyzed the minimal periodontal surgical techniques proposed for the periodontal regeneration. In addition to the parameters set in the various flowcharts, we have highlighted the following additional parameters: papilla height loss; supra bone component of the defect; Δ Bone Sounding; width of keratinized tissue.

Conclusion: The decision-making chart improved with the new clinically relevant factors may serve as a useful guideline for dentists, but to definitively validate it, further studies need to be developed in the future. In order to clarify the proposed flow chart, the authors present two different clinical cases.

Keywords: Guided tissue regeneration; periodontal regeneration; wound healing.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Hiatt WH, Stallard RE, Butler ED, Badgett B. Repair following mucoperiosteal flap surgery with full gingival retention. J Periodontol. 1968;39:11-16.
    1. Nyman S, Karring T. Regeneration of surgically removed buccal alveolar bone in dogs. J Periodontal Res. 1979;14:86-92.
    1. Nyman S, Lindhe J, Karring T, Rylander H. New attachment following surgical treatment of human periodontal disease. J Clin Periodontol. 1982;9:290-296.
    1. Nyman S, Gottlow J, Karring T, Lindhe J. The regenerative potential of the periodontal ligament. An experimental study in the monkey. J Clin Periodontol. 1982;9:257-265.
    1. Karring T, Nyman S, Thilander B, Magnusson I. Bone regeneration in orthodontically produced alveolar bone dehiscence. J Periodontal Res. 1982;17:309-315.

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources