Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2021 Apr;26(4):e622-e631.
doi: 10.1002/onco.13632. Epub 2021 Jan 5.

Optimal Avapritinib Treatment Strategies for Patients with Metastatic or Unresectable Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Optimal Avapritinib Treatment Strategies for Patients with Metastatic or Unresectable Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors

Cissimol P Joseph et al. Oncologist. 2021 Apr.

Abstract

Background: Avapritinib, a novel inhibitor of KIT/PDGFRA, is approved in the U.S. for the treatment of adults with PDGFRA exon 18-mutant unresectable or metastatic gastrointestinal stromal tumors (U/M GISTs). We assessed the safety of avapritinib and provide evidence-based guidance on management of avapritinib-associated adverse events (AEs), including cognitive effects and intracranial bleeding.

Materials and methods: We performed a post hoc analysis of data from a two-part, single-arm dose escalation/expansion phase I study (NAVIGATOR; NCT02508532) in patients with U/M GISTs treated with oral avapritinib 30-600 mg once daily. The primary endpoints were safety and tolerability; the impact of dose modification (interruption and/or reduction) on progression-free survival (PFS) was a secondary endpoint. Efficacy analyses were limited to patients who started avapritinib at 300 mg (approved dose).

Results: Of 250 patients enrolled in the study, 74.0% presented with KIT mutation and 24.8% presented with PDGFRA exon 18-mutation; 66.8% started avapritinib at 300 mg. The most common treatment-related AEs (any grade) were nausea (59.2%), fatigue (50.0%), periorbital edema (42.0%), anemia (39.2%), diarrhea (36.0%), vomiting (36.0%), and increased lacrimation (30.8%). No treatment-related deaths occurred. Among 167 patients starting on 300 mg avapritinib, all-cause cognitive effects rate (grade 1-2) was 37.0% in all patients and 52.0% in patients ≥65 years. Cognitive effects improved to a lower grade more quickly with dose modification (1.3-3.1 weeks) than without (4.9-7.6 weeks). Median PFS was 11.4 months with dose modification and 7.2 months without.

Conclusion: Tolerability-guided dose modification of avapritinib is an effective strategy for managing AEs in patients with GISTs.

Implications for practice: Early recognition of adverse events and tailored dose modification appear to be effective approaches for managing treatment-related adverse events and maintaining patients on avapritinib. Dose reduction does not appear to result in reduced efficacy. Patients' cognitive function should be assessed at baseline and monitored carefully throughout treatment with avapritinib for the onset of cognitive adverse events. Dose interruption is recommended at the first sign of any cognitive effect, including grade 1 events.

Keywords: Avapritinib; Cognitive effects; Gastrointestinal stromal tumor; KIT; PDGFRA.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Disclosures of potential conflicts of interest may be found at the end of this article.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Onset of all‐cause AEs before and after dose reduction in the safety population. Worst‐grade period is presented for the onset of any AE, cognitive effects, edemas, nausea, fatigue, anemia, and diarrhea in patients who experienced dose reduction (n = 81).Abbreviation: AE, adverse event.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Time to improvement of grade ≥2 cognitive effects in patients who started treatment with avapritinib 300 mg. Kaplan‐Meier estimated time (weeks) to improvement of cognitive effects from grade ≥2 to (A) a lower grade or (B) grade 1 or resolution.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Effect of dose reduction on progression‐free survival in patients who started treatment with avapritinib 300 mg. Kaplan‐Meier estimate of progression‐free survival in the safety population (n = 97) with or without dose reduction.

References

    1. Demetri GD, von Mehren M, Antonescu CR et al. NCCN Task Force report: Update on the management of patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumors. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 2010;8(suppl 2):S1–41; quiz S42–44. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ducimetiere F, Lurkin A, Ranchere‐Vince D et al. Incidence of sarcoma histotypes and molecular subtypes in a prospective epidemiological study with central pathology review and molecular testing. PLoS One 2011;6:e20294. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Soreide K, Sandvik OM, Soreide JA et al. Global epidemiology of gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GIST): A systematic review of population‐based cohort studies. Cancer Epidemiol 2016;40:39–46. - PubMed
    1. Nilsson B, Bumming P, Meis‐Kindblom JM et al. Gastrointestinal stromal tumors: The incidence, prevalence, clinical course, and prognostication in the preimatinib mesylate era–A population‐based study in western Sweden. Cancer 2005;103:821–829. - PubMed
    1. Casali PG, Abecassis N, Aro HT et al. Gastrointestinal stromal tumours: ESMO‐EURACAN clinical practice guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow‐up. Ann Oncol 2018;29:iv68–iv78. - PubMed

Publication types

Associated data