Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Dec 10;15(12):e0240669.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0240669. eCollection 2020.

Rivaroxaban improves vascular response in LPS-induced acute inflammation in experimental models

Affiliations

Rivaroxaban improves vascular response in LPS-induced acute inflammation in experimental models

Armond Daci et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Rivaroxaban (RVX) was suggested to possess anti-inflammatory and vascular tone modulatory effects. The goal of this study was to investigate whether RVX impacts lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-induced acute vascular inflammatory response. Male rats were treated with 5 mg/kg RVX (oral gavage) followed by 10 mg/kg LPS i.p injection. Circulating levels of IL-6, MCP-1, VCAM-1, and ICAM-1 were measured in plasma 6 and 24 hours after LPS injection, while isolated aorta was used for gene expression analysis, immunohistochemistry, and vascular tone evaluation. RVX pre-treatment significantly reduced LPS mediated increase after 6h and 24h for IL-6 (4.4±2.2 and 2.8±1.7 fold), MCP-1 (1.4±1.5 and 1.3±1.4 fold) VCAM-1 (1.8±2.0 and 1.7±2.1 fold). A similar trend was observed in the aorta for iNOS (5.5±3.3 and 3.3±1.9 folds reduction, P<0.01 and P<0.001, respectively), VCAM-1 (1.3±1.2 and 1.4±1.3 fold reduction, P<0.05), and MCP-1 (3.9±2.2 and 1.9±1.6 fold reduction, P<0.01). Moreover, RVX pre-treatment, improved LPS-induced PE contractile dysfunction in aortic rings (Control vs LPS, Emax reduction = 35.4 and 31.19%, P<0.001; Control vs LPS+RVX, Emax reduction = 10.83 and 11.48%, P>0.05, respectively), resulting in 24.5% and 19.7% change in maximal constriction in LPS and LPS+RVX respectively. These data indicate that RVX pre-treatment attenuates LPS-induced acute vascular inflammation and contractile dysfunction.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. Role of RVX pre-treatment on LPS-induced proinflammatory and proadhesive mediator release in rat plasma.
IL-6 (A), MCP-1 (1B), VCAM-1 (C) and ICAM-1 (D) plasma levels (pg/mL) from LPS treated rats in the presence or absence of RVX for 6 hours and 24 hours compared to controls. ##P<0.01 and ###P<0.001 (Student’s t-test) vs. control conditions. *P<0.05, ** P<0.01 and ***P<0.001 (Student’s t-test) vs LPS. Values are expressed as the mean±SEM (n = 6).
Fig 2
Fig 2. Role of RVX pre-treatment on LPS induced proinflammatory and proadhesive mediator’s gene expression in rat aorta.
Comparisons of relative IL-6, MCP-1, VCAM-1 and ICAM-1 gene expression levels normalized to GAPDH in the rat aorta obtained from RVX- or non-treated LPS rats and non-treated control rats 6 hours (A) and 24 hours (B) post LPS exposure. *P<0.05, ** P<0.01 and ***P<0.001 indicates values significantly different (Student’s t-test) vs LPS. Values are expressed as the mean±SEM (n = 6).
Fig 3
Fig 3. Role of RVX pre-treatment on LPS induced proinflammatory and proadhesive mediator’s protein expression in rat aorta.
Representative immunohistochemical results for aortic iNOS (A), MCP-1 (B) and VCAM-1 (C) expressions from RVX- or non-treated LPS rats and non-treated control rats as described in the legend. % of IHC positive areas are represented as graphs. ### indicates values significantly different (Student’s t-test) vs. control conditions. *P<0.05, ** P<0.01 and ***P<0.001 indicates values significantly different (Student’s t-test) vs LPS. Values are expressed as the mean±SEM (n = 6).
Fig 4
Fig 4
Role of RVX on the vasoreactivity of aortic rings obtained from A) rats sacrificed 6 hours post LPS and B) rats sacrificed 24 hours post LPS to PE-induced contractions. Comparisons of vascular reactivity to PE in aortic rings from RVX- or non-treated LPS rats and non-treated control rats. *P<0.05, ** P<0.01 and ***P<0.001 indicates statistical significance (Two-Way ANOVA followed Bonferroni correction) vs. control; #P<0.05 and ##P<0.01 indicates values significantly different (Two-Way ANOVA followed Bonferroni correction) vs. LPS. Values are expressed as the ± SEM (n = 6).
Fig 5
Fig 5. Schematic diagram for the protection of RVX against acute inflammation and vascular dysfunction following LPS-induced endotoxin shock.
RVX pretreatment decreased the expression of pro-inflammatory mediators and adhesion molecules and improved aortic hypo responsiveness to PE induced by LPS in the aorta. The figure was prepared with BioRender (biorender.com).

References

    1. Olie RH, van der Meijden PEJ, ten Cate H. The coagulation system in atherothrombosis: Implications for new therapeutic strategies. Res Pract Thromb Haemost. 2018;2: 188–198. 10.1002/rth2.12080 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Weitz JI, Fredenburgh JC. Factors XI and XII as targets for new anticoagulants. Frontiers in Medicine. Frontiers Media S.A.; 2017. 10.3389/fmed.2017.00019 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Rupprecht HJ, Blank R. Clinical pharmacology of direct and indirect factor xa inhibitors. Drugs. 2010. pp. 2153–2170. 10.2165/11538030-000000000-00000 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Gieseler F, Ungefroren H, Settmacher U, Hollenberg MD, Kaufmann R. Proteinase-activated receptors (PARs)—Focus on receptor-receptor- interactions and their physiological and pathophysiological impact. Cell Communication and Signaling. 2013. 10.1186/1478-811X-11-86 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Papadaki S, Tselepis AD. Nonhemostatic Activities of Factor Xa: Are There Pleiotropic Effects of Anti-FXa Direct Oral Anticoagulants? Angiology. SAGE Publications Inc; 2019. pp. 896–907. 10.1177/0003319719840861 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types