COVID-19 Misinformation Trends in Australia: Prospective Longitudinal National Survey
- PMID: 33302250
- PMCID: PMC7800906
- DOI: 10.2196/23805
COVID-19 Misinformation Trends in Australia: Prospective Longitudinal National Survey
Abstract
Background: Misinformation about COVID-19 is common and has been spreading rapidly across the globe through social media platforms and other information systems. Understanding what the public knows about COVID-19 and identifying beliefs based on misinformation can help shape effective public health communications to ensure efforts to reduce viral transmission are not undermined.
Objective: This study aimed to investigate the prevalence and factors associated with COVID-19 misinformation in Australia and their changes over time.
Methods: This prospective, longitudinal national survey was completed by adults (18 years and above) across April (n=4362), May (n=1882), and June (n=1369) 2020.
Results: Stronger agreement with misinformation was associated with younger age, male gender, lower education level, and language other than English spoken at home (P<.01 for all). After controlling for these variables, misinformation beliefs were significantly associated (P<.001) with lower levels of digital health literacy, perceived threat of COVID-19, confidence in government, and trust in scientific institutions. Analyses of specific government-identified misinformation revealed 3 clusters: prevention (associated with male gender and younger age), causation (associated with lower education level and greater social disadvantage), and cure (associated with younger age). Lower institutional trust and greater rejection of official government accounts were associated with stronger agreement with COVID-19 misinformation.
Conclusions: The findings of this study highlight important gaps in communication effectiveness, which must be addressed to ensure effective COVID-19 prevention.
Keywords: COVID-19; conspiracy; coronavirus; digital health; infodemic; literacy; misinformation; myths; social media; trust.
©Kristen Pickles, Erin Cvejic, Brooke Nickel, Tessa Copp, Carissa Bonner, Julie Leask, Julie Ayre, Carys Batcup, Samuel Cornell, Thomas Dakin, Rachael H Dodd, Jennifer M J Isautier, Kirsten J McCaffery. Originally published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (http://www.jmir.org), 07.01.2021.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflicts of Interest: None declared.
Figures
References
-
- Tan ASL, Lee C, Chae J. Exposure to health (mis)information: lagged effects on young adults' health behaviors and potential pathways. J Commun. 2015 Jul 06;65(4):674–698. doi: 10.1111/jcom.12163. - DOI
-
- Depoux A, Martin S, Karafillakis E, Preet Raman, Wilder-Smith A, Larson H. The pandemic of social media panic travels faster than the COVID-19 outbreak. J Travel Med. 2020 May 18;27(3) doi: 10.1093/jtm/taaa031. http://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/32125413 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Kouzy R, Abi Jaoude Joseph, Kraitem Afif, El Alam Molly B, Karam Basil, Adib Elio, Zarka Jabra, Traboulsi Cindy, Akl Elie W, Baddour Khalil. Coronavirus goes viral: quantifying the COVID-19 misinformation epidemic on Twitter. Cureus. 2020 Mar 13;12(3):e7255. doi: 10.7759/cureus.7255. http://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/32292669 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Mian A, Khan S. Coronavirus: the spread of misinformation. BMC Med. 2020 Mar 18;18(1):89. doi: 10.1186/s12916-020-01556-3. https://bmcmedicine.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12916-020-01556-3 - DOI - DOI - PMC - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous
