Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Dec 10;20(1):303.
doi: 10.1186/s12874-020-01184-8.

Linkage of primary care prescribing records and pharmacy dispensing Records in the Salford Lung Study: application in asthma

Affiliations

Linkage of primary care prescribing records and pharmacy dispensing Records in the Salford Lung Study: application in asthma

Holly Tibble et al. BMC Med Res Methodol. .

Abstract

Background: Records of medication prescriptions can be used in conjunction with pharmacy dispensing records to investigate the incidence of adherence, which is defined as observing the treatment plans agreed between a patient and their clinician. Using prescribing records alone fails to identify primary non-adherence; medications not being collected from the dispensary. Using dispensing records alone means that cases of conditions that resolve and/or treatments that are discontinued will be unaccounted for. While using a linked prescribing and dispensing dataset to measure medication non-adherence is optimal, this linkage is not routinely conducted. Furthermore, without a unique common event identifier, linkage between these two datasets is not straightforward.

Methods: We undertook a secondary analysis of the Salford Lung Study dataset. A novel probabilistic record linkage methodology was developed matching asthma medication pharmacy dispensing records and primary care prescribing records, using semantic (meaning) and syntactic (structure) harmonization, domain knowledge integration, and natural language feature extraction. Cox survival analysis was conducted to assess factors associated with the time to medication dispensing after the prescription was written. Finally, we used a simplified record linkage algorithm in which only identical records were matched, for a naïve benchmarking to compare against the results of our proposed methodology.

Results: We matched 83% of pharmacy dispensing records to primary care prescribing records. Missing data were prevalent in the dispensing records which were not matched - approximately 60% for both medication strength and quantity. A naïve benchmarking approach, requiring perfect matching, identified one-quarter as many matching prescribing records as our methodology. Factors associated with delay (or failure) to collect the prescribed medication from a pharmacy included season, quantity of medication prescribed, previous dispensing history and class of medication. Our findings indicate that over 30% of prescriptions issued were not collected from a dispensary (primary non-adherence).

Conclusions: We have developed a probabilistic record linkage methodology matching a large percentage of pharmacy dispensing records with primary care prescribing records for asthma medications. This will allow researchers to link datasets in order to extract information about asthma medication non-adherence.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The Salford Lung Study was funded by GlaxoSmithKline. JL-F was an employee of GlaxoSmithKline during the conduct of the study, and holds shares/options in the company. No other authors have any conflict pertaining to this manuscript to disclose.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Diagram representing the data linkage algorithm
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Data Linkage Flow Diagram
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Distributions of linkage weight points per variable, for candidates and final matches
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Kaplan-Meier of the time to collecting prescriptions, censored at three weeks

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. John D, Michael W, Twigg J. Community pharmacy: an untapped patient data resource. Integr Pharm Res Pract. 2016;5:19–25. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Karter AJ, Parker MM, Moffet HH, Ahmed AT, Schmittdiel JA, Selby J V. New Prescription Medication Gaps: A Comprehensive Measure of Adherence to New Prescriptions. Health Serv Res. 2009;44(5):1640–1661. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2754552/pdf/hesr0044-1640.pdf[cited 2018 19 Dec]. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Andrade SE, Kahler KH, Frech F, Chan KA. Methods for evaluation of medication adherence and persistence using automated databases. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2006;15(8):565–574. doi: 10.1002/pds.1230. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hess LM, Raebel MA, Conner DA, Malone DC. Measurement of Adherence in Pharmacy Administrative Databases: A Proposal for Standard Definitions and Preferred Measures. Ann Pharmacother. 2006;40:1280–1288. doi: 10.1345/aph.1H018. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Cutler RL, Fernandez-Llimos F, Frommer M, Benrimoj C, Garcia-Cardenas V. Economic impact of medication non- adherence by disease groups: a systematic review. BMJ Open. 2018;8:e016982. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016982. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types