Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Feb;61(2):211-218.
doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2020.11.004. Epub 2020 Dec 7.

Progressive Device Failure at Long Term Follow Up of the Nellix EndoVascular Aneurysm Sealing (EVAS) System

Aminder A Singh  1 , Kapila S Benaragama  1 , Tasneem Pope  2 , Patrick A Coughlin  1 , Andrew P Winterbottom  3 , Seamus C Harrison  1 , Jonathan R Boyle  4
Affiliations
Free article

Progressive Device Failure at Long Term Follow Up of the Nellix EndoVascular Aneurysm Sealing (EVAS) System

Aminder A Singh et al. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2021 Feb.
Free article

Abstract

Objective: High rates of midterm failure of the Nellix EndoVascular Aneurysm Sealing (EVAS) System resulted in device withdrawal from the UK market. The study aim was to report long term Nellix EVAS outcomes and management of a failing device.

Methods: A retrospective review of EVAS procedures at a tertiary unit was performed. Device failure was defined as a triad of stent migration, stent separation, and secondary sac expansion, or any intervention for type 1 endoleak, device rupture, or explant.

Results: 161 (male n = 140, female n = 21) patients with a median follow up of 6.0 (IQR 5.0-6.6) years were included. Freedom from all cause mortality estimate at six years was 41.5%. There were 70 (43.5%) device failures with a freedom from device failure estimate at six years of 32.3%. Failure was the result of sac expansion (n = 41), caudal stent migration (n = 36), stent separation (n = 26), and secondary AAA rupture (n = 15). A substantial number of type 1 endoleaks was present (1a n = 33, 1b n = 11), but the type 2 endoleak rate was low at 3.7%. Some 36 (22.4%) patients required re-intervention. Twenty-one patients underwent explant with no 30 day deaths. Six patients underwent Nellix-in-Nellix application (NINA) with one early death from bowel ischaemia and one patient who died later from non-aneurysm related cause. Two NINA patients have ongoing sac expansion and two have had thrombosis of a Nellix limb or visceral stent. Proximal embolisation was only successful in one of six cases.

Conclusion: The long term failure rate of Nellix EVAS is high. All patients with a device must be informed and be enrolled in enhanced surveillance. EVAS explant is an acceptable technique with favourable outcomes. Management by open explant, if the patient is fit, should be considered early and offered to those with device failure.

Keywords: Abdominal aortic aneurysm; EVAS; Endograft; Nellix endovascular aneurysm sealing; Stent graft.

PubMed Disclaimer

LinkOut - more resources