Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021 Mar;14(3):285-306.
doi: 10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-20-0425. Epub 2020 Dec 10.

Mitochondria as a Novel Target for Cancer Chemoprevention: Emergence of Mitochondrial-targeting Agents

Affiliations
Review

Mitochondria as a Novel Target for Cancer Chemoprevention: Emergence of Mitochondrial-targeting Agents

Mofei Huang et al. Cancer Prev Res (Phila). 2021 Mar.

Abstract

Cancer chemoprevention is the most effective approach to control cancer in the population. Despite significant progress, chemoprevention has not been widely adopted because agents that are safe tend to be less effective and those that are highly effective tend to be toxic. Thus, there is an urgent need to develop novel and effective chemopreventive agents, such as mitochondria-targeted agents, that can prevent cancer and prolong survival. Mitochondria, the central site for cellular energy production, have important functions in cell survival and death. Several studies have revealed a significant role for mitochondrial metabolism in promoting cancer development and progression, making mitochondria a promising new target for cancer prevention. Conjugating delocalized lipophilic cations, such as triphenylphosphonium cation (TPP+), to compounds of interest is an effective approach for mitochondrial targeting. The hyperpolarized tumor cell membrane and mitochondrial membrane potential allow for selective accumulation of TPP+ conjugates in tumor cell mitochondria versus those in normal cells. This could enhance direct killing of precancerous, dysplastic, and tumor cells while minimizing potential toxicities to normal cells.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: M. Y. is a co-founder of OncoImmune, Inc. No potential conflicts of interest were disclosed by other authors.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.. The basis for mitochondrial targeting using mito-compounds for cancer cell killing.
(A) Cancer cells have a more hyperpolarized membrane, which serves to drive the uptake of TPP+-conjugated compounds up to 100–1000-fold compared to extracellular compounds. Moreover, elevated ROS production in cancer cells renders them potentially more vulnerable to be killed by ROS-generating agents (like TPP+-conjugated compounds). (B) Normal cells have a less hyperpolarized mitochondrial membrane and comparatively lower levels of ROS, which leads to less uptake of mito-compounds and insufficient ROS to initiate cell death.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Chemical structures of representative mitochondria-targeted compounds.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.. Potential anticancer activities of mitochondria-targeted compounds (MTC).
Inhibition on ETC by MTC (A) leads to mitochondrial uncoupling, with overproduction of mitochondrial ROS (B) (31, 32), and decreases in ATP generation (C) (30, 109). The initial production of mitochondrial ROS can lead to membrane potential dissipation (D) (69, 96, 115), and opening of the mitochondrial permeability transition pore (mPTPC) (E) (73). The opening of the mPTPC could intensify mitochondrial ROS production (F) (191), allowing large amounts of solutes to enter the mitochondrial matrix and cause necrosis-like cell death (G) (191), and release of cytochrome c (Cyt C) into cytosol to trigger apoptosis (H) (73, 115, 156). Induction of mitochondrial outer membrane permeabilization (MOMP, I) (152), inhibition of Kv1.3 channels (J) (155) and TrxR activity (K) (69) by MTC could also promote more ROS production. Excessive mitochondrial ROS can damage mitochondrial DNA (L) (118) and telomeric nuclear DNA (nDNA) (M) (192). These mitochondrial stressors can potentially lead to autophagy-induced cell death (N) (32).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Zhao RZ, Jiang S, Zhang L, Yu ZB. Mitochondrial electron transport chain, ROS generation and uncoupling (Review). International journal of molecular medicine. 2019;44(1):3–15. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Tait SWG, Green DR. Mitochondrial regulation of cell death. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2013;5(9):a008706. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Warburg O The Metabolism of Carcinoma Cells. The Journal of Cancer Research. 1925;9(1):148.
    1. Racker E. Bioenergetics and the Problem of Tumor Growth: An understanding of the mechanism of the generation and control of biological energy may shed light on the problem of tumor growth. American Scientist. 1972;60(1):56–63. - PubMed
    1. DeBerardinis RJ, Chandel NS. Fundamentals of cancer metabolism. Sci Adv. 2016;2(5):e1600200–e. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types