Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Nov 16:11:580114.
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.580114. eCollection 2020.

Consumer Response to Corporate Hypocrisy From the Perspective of Expectation Confirmation Theory

Affiliations

Consumer Response to Corporate Hypocrisy From the Perspective of Expectation Confirmation Theory

Wang Zhigang et al. Front Psychol. .

Abstract

Based on the concept of hypocrisy perception, this paper studies and discusses consumers' response to corporate social responsibility (CSR) hypocrisy perception, discusses the formation of consumers' hypocrisy perception from the perspective of consumers' expectation of CSR, and originally reveals the psychological and behavioral mechanisms of the generation of negative emotions and their role in consumer response. The results are as follows: (1) consumers' CSR expectations and CSR perceived performance have a significant impact on their perception of hypocrisy; (2) consumers' perception of hypocrisy has a significant impact on their negative emotions; (3) consumers' negative emotions can have a significant impact on their attitudes and negative behaviors. The research results show that consumers' expectations of CSR activities can affect consumers' attitudes and behaviors, among which consumers' perceived CSR performance, perceived hypocrisy, and negative emotions play an important role. In the implementation of CSR activities, enterprises should avoid making consumers have excessive expectations and appease their negative emotions, so as to improve the implementation effect of CSR activities.

Keywords: corporate hypocrisy; corporate social responsibility; expectation; negative behaviors; negative emotions.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Conceptual model.
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Path analysis of the structural equation model. Note. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Aaker J. L. (1997). Dimensions of brand personality. J. Market. Res. 34 347–356.
    1. Ajzen I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Processes 50 179–211.
    1. Amélie G. (2019). Brand hypocrisy from a consumer perspective: scale development and validation. J. Product Brand Manage. 28 598–613. 10.1108/jpbm-06-2017-1504 - DOI
    1. Anderson C. A., Kellam K. L. (1992). Belief perseverance, biased assimilation, and covariation detection: the effects of hypothetical social theories and new data. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 18 555–565. 10.1177/0146167292185005 - DOI
    1. Anderson E. W., Sullivan M. W. (1993). The antecedents and consequences of customer satisfaction for firms. Market. Sci. 12 125–143. 10.1287/mksc.12.2.125 - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources