Consumer Response to Corporate Hypocrisy From the Perspective of Expectation Confirmation Theory
- PMID: 33304297
- PMCID: PMC7701281
- DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.580114
Consumer Response to Corporate Hypocrisy From the Perspective of Expectation Confirmation Theory
Abstract
Based on the concept of hypocrisy perception, this paper studies and discusses consumers' response to corporate social responsibility (CSR) hypocrisy perception, discusses the formation of consumers' hypocrisy perception from the perspective of consumers' expectation of CSR, and originally reveals the psychological and behavioral mechanisms of the generation of negative emotions and their role in consumer response. The results are as follows: (1) consumers' CSR expectations and CSR perceived performance have a significant impact on their perception of hypocrisy; (2) consumers' perception of hypocrisy has a significant impact on their negative emotions; (3) consumers' negative emotions can have a significant impact on their attitudes and negative behaviors. The research results show that consumers' expectations of CSR activities can affect consumers' attitudes and behaviors, among which consumers' perceived CSR performance, perceived hypocrisy, and negative emotions play an important role. In the implementation of CSR activities, enterprises should avoid making consumers have excessive expectations and appease their negative emotions, so as to improve the implementation effect of CSR activities.
Keywords: corporate hypocrisy; corporate social responsibility; expectation; negative behaviors; negative emotions.
Copyright © 2020 Zhigang, Lei and Xintao.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Effect of Matching Between the Adopted Corporate Response Strategy and the Type of Hypocrisy Manifestation on Consumer Behavior: Mediating Role of Negative Emotions.Front Psychol. 2022 May 20;13:831197. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.831197. eCollection 2022. Front Psychol. 2022. PMID: 35668970 Free PMC article.
-
Perception of Corporate Hypocrisy in China: The Roles of Corporate Social Responsibility Implementation and Communication.Front Psychol. 2020 Apr 22;11:595. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00595. eCollection 2020. Front Psychol. 2020. PMID: 32425840 Free PMC article.
-
Consumers' Corporate Social Responsibility Perception and Anti-Consumer Awareness: Roles of Compassion and Corporate Social Responsibility Authenticity in South Korea.Behav Sci (Basel). 2023 Jul 26;13(8):622. doi: 10.3390/bs13080622. Behav Sci (Basel). 2023. PMID: 37622762 Free PMC article.
-
Corporate Social Responsibility and Consumer Emotional Marketing in Big Data Era: A Mini Literature Review.Front Psychol. 2022 May 26;13:919601. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.919601. eCollection 2022. Front Psychol. 2022. PMID: 35693492 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Consumers' Decision-Making Process on Social Commerce Platforms: Online Trust, Perceived Risk, and Purchase Intentions.Front Psychol. 2020 May 15;11:890. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00890. eCollection 2020. Front Psychol. 2020. PMID: 32499740 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Effect of Matching Between the Adopted Corporate Response Strategy and the Type of Hypocrisy Manifestation on Consumer Behavior: Mediating Role of Negative Emotions.Front Psychol. 2022 May 20;13:831197. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.831197. eCollection 2022. Front Psychol. 2022. PMID: 35668970 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Aaker J. L. (1997). Dimensions of brand personality. J. Market. Res. 34 347–356.
-
- Ajzen I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Processes 50 179–211.
-
- Amélie G. (2019). Brand hypocrisy from a consumer perspective: scale development and validation. J. Product Brand Manage. 28 598–613. 10.1108/jpbm-06-2017-1504 - DOI
-
- Anderson C. A., Kellam K. L. (1992). Belief perseverance, biased assimilation, and covariation detection: the effects of hypothetical social theories and new data. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 18 555–565. 10.1177/0146167292185005 - DOI
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources