Endoscopic radial incision and cutting technique for treatment-naive stricture of colorectal anastomosis: Two case reports
- PMID: 33304448
- PMCID: PMC7701878
- DOI: 10.4240/wjgs.v12.i11.460
Endoscopic radial incision and cutting technique for treatment-naive stricture of colorectal anastomosis: Two case reports
Abstract
Background: Anastomotic stenosis (AS) after colorectal surgery was treated with balloon dilation, endoscopic procedure or surgery. The endoscopic procedures including dilation, electrocautery incision, or radial incision and cutting (RIC) were preferred because of lower complication rates than surgery and are less invasive. Endoscopic RIC has a greater success rate than dilation methods. Most reports showed that repeated RICs were needed to maintain patency of the anastomosis. We report that single session RIC was applied only to treatment-naive patients with AS.
Case summary: Two female patients presented with AS. One patient had advanced rectal cancer and the other had a refractory stenosis following surgery for endometriosis at sigmoid colon. The endoscopic RIC procedure was performed as follows. A single small incision was carefully made to increase the view of the proximal colon and the incision was expanded until the surgical stapling line. Finally, we made a further circumferential excision with endoscopic knife along the inner border of the surgical staple line. At the end of the procedure, the standard colonoscope was able to pass freely through the widened opening. All patients showed improved AS after a single session of RIC without immediate or delayed procedure-related complications. Follow-up colonoscopy at 7 and 8 mo after endoscopic RIC revealed intact anastomotic sites in both patients. No treatment-related adverse events or recurrence of the stenosis was demonstrated during follow-up periods of 20 and 23 mo.
Conclusion: The endoscopic RIC may play a role as one of treatment options for treatment-naive AS with short stenotic lengths.
Keywords: Anastomosis; Case report; Colorectal surgery; Endoscopy; Radial incision; Stenosis.
©The Author(s) 2020. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflict-of-interest statement: The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest regarding the publication of this manuscript.
Figures
References
-
- Luchtefeld MA, Milsom JW, Senagore A, Surrell JA, Mazier WP. Colorectal anastomotic stenosis. Results of a survey of the ASCRS membership. Dis Colon Rectum. 1989;32:733–736. - PubMed
-
- Ferzoco LB, Raptopoulos V, Silen W. Acute diverticulitis. N Engl J Med. 1998;338:1521–1526. - PubMed
-
- Sartori A, De Luca M, Fiscon V, Frego M CANSAS study working group; Portale G. Retrospective multicenter study of post-operative stenosis after stapled colorectal anastomosis. Updates Surg. 2019;71:539–542. - PubMed
-
- Polese L, Vecchiato M, Frigo AC, Sarzo G, Cadrobbi R, Rizzato R, Bressan A, Merigliano S. Risk factors for colorectal anastomotic stenoses and their impact on quality of life: what are the lessons to learn? Colorectal Dis. 2012;14:e124–e128. - PubMed
-
- Kraenzler A, Maggiori L, Pittet O, Alyami MS, Prost À la Denise J, Panis Y. Anastomotic stenosis after coloanal, colorectal and ileoanal anastomosis: what is the best management? Colorectal Dis. 2017;19:O90–O96. - PubMed
Publication types
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials
Miscellaneous
