Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Dec;99(6):337-343.
doi: 10.4174/astr.2020.99.6.337. Epub 2020 Nov 26.

Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio predicts early acute cellular rejection in living donor liver transplantation

Affiliations

Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio predicts early acute cellular rejection in living donor liver transplantation

Boram Lee et al. Ann Surg Treat Res. 2020 Dec.

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of this study was to evaluate the predictive value of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) in acute cellular rejection (ACR) after living donor liver transplantation (LDLT).

Methods: All consecutive patients who underwent ABO-compatible (ABOc) LDLT from September 2014 to December 2017 were retrospectively reviewed. NLR was calculated on 3 occasions; (1) 4 weeks prior to liver transplantation (LT), (2) the day of LT, and (3) the day before liver biopsy.

Results: Among 66 patients who underwent ABOc LDLT, ACR was identified in 15 patients (22.7%) on protocol liver biopsy performed routinely on the postoperative day 7. There was no significant difference in NLR at 4 weeks prior to LT and the day of LT between no-ACR and ACR group (2.98 ± 1.92 vs. 2.54 ± 1.15, P = 0.433; 17.9 ± 8.31 vs. 20.5 ± 13.4, P = 0.393). However, NLR was significantly lower in ACR group compared to non-ACR group just prior to liver biopsy (5.82 ± 3.42 vs. 18.4 ± 17.2, P = 0.035). NLR tends to decrease 3.5 days before the onset of ACR. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for optimal cut-off value of NLR was 6.49, with sensitivity and specificity of 80.4% and 73.3% respectively.

Conclusion: NLR has a potential as a noninvasive predictor of early ACR in ABOc LDLT.

Keywords: Liver transplantation; Lymphocytes; Neutrophils; Rejection.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest: No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1. It shows the trend of the percentage of serum neutrophil, lymphocyte, eosinophil, and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) according to the postoperative course in the acute cellular rejection (ACR) group. NLR tends to decrease in the 3.5 days before the onset of ACR. LT, liver transplantation.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve for the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) for predicting the occurrence of acute cellular rejection (ACR). In the ROC curve for ACR, the area under the ROC curve of NLR was 81.0%. The optimal cut-off value was 6.49, and the sensitivity and specificity of NLR were 80.4% and 73.3%, respectively.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Maluf DG, Stravitz RT, Cotterell AH, Posner MP, Nakatsuka M, Sterling RK, et al. Adult living donor versus deceased donor liver transplantation: a 6-year single center experience. Am J Transplant. 2005;5:149–156. - PubMed
    1. Gruttadauria S, Vasta F, Mandalà L, Cintorino D, Piazza T, Spada M, et al. Basiliximab in a triple-drug regimen with tacrolimus and steroids in liver transplantation. Transplant Proc. 2005;37:2611–2613. - PubMed
    1. Emond JC, Rouch D, Thistlethwaite J, Whitington P, Baker A, Ferrari M, et al. Rejection in liver allograft recipients: clinical characterization and management. Clin transplant. 1987;1:143–150.
    1. Soin AS, Rasmussen A, Jamieson NV, Watson CJ, Friend PJ, Wight DG, et al. CsA levels in the early posttransplant period: predictive of chronic rejection in liver transplantation? Transplantation. 1995;59:1119–1123. - PubMed
    1. Neil DA, Hubscher SG. Delay in diagnosis: a factor in the poor outcome of late acute rejection of liver allografts. Transplant Proc. 2001;33:1525–1526. - PubMed