Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Nov 25:26:47-54.
doi: 10.1016/j.ctro.2020.11.006. eCollection 2021 Jan.

Optimal timing of radiotherapy in high risk prostate cancer: Do missed days matter?

Affiliations

Optimal timing of radiotherapy in high risk prostate cancer: Do missed days matter?

Shaakir Hasan et al. Clin Transl Radiat Oncol. .

Abstract

Introduction: High-risk prostate cancer is associated with poorer overall survival (OS) and biochemical control compared to more favorable risk groups. External beam radiation therapy (EBRT) is widely used; however, outcomes data are limited with respect to time elapsed between diagnosis and initiation of EBRT.

Methods: The National Cancer Database was queried from 2004 to 2015 for patients diagnosed with high-risk adenocarcinoma of the prostate who received androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) and definitive EBRT. Logistic regression was utilized to determine covariates associated with missing EBRT treatments. OS was analyzed using multivariate cox proportional hazards models and propensity score matching.

Results: 9,610 patients met inclusion criteria with median follow-up of 40.6 months and median age of 72 years. Median PSA was 8.7 and median EBRT dose was 78 Gy. ADT was initiated at a median of 36 days and EBRT at a median of 63 days post-diagnosis. Median number of prolonged treatment days was 2.2. Black race (OR: 1.40; p < 0.01), treatment at a community clinic (OR: 1.32; p < 0.01), and living in an urban/densely populated area were associated with prolonged treatment. Time elapsed between ADT and EBRT > 74 days (HR: 1.20; p = 0.01) and prolonged treatment>3 days of EBRT (HR: 1.26; p = 0.005) were associated with an increased hazard of death. The 5-year OS was 79.6% and 82.9% for patients with prolonged treatment of 3 days or more of EBRT and those missing 3 days or less, respectively (p = 0.0006).

Conclusion: In this hypothesis-generating study, prolonged treatment delays and missing three or more EBRT treatments was associated with poorer OS in patients with high-risk adenocarcinoma of the prostate.

Keywords: Androgen deprivation therapy; External beam radiation therapy; Prostate cancer; Radiation oncology; Survival; Urology.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
CONSORT diagram of patient selection. CONSORT diagram depicting our stepwise implementation of exclusion criteria. A total of 282,220 patients from 2004 to 2015 were recorded in the NCDB with T1-3N0M0 adenocarcinoma of the prostate in the NCDB. Ultimately, 9,610 patients met inclusion criteria and were included in this analysis.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Kaplan Meier survival curve for all patients completing EBRT within and beyond 3 missed treatment days. Kaplan Meier curves for overall survival among patients who missed 3 days of less of EBRT (blue) and over 3 days of EBRT (green), where the x-axis represents the time in months and the y-axis represents the survival probability. At 6-years, the OS was 79.5% for the former and 72.5% for the latter (p = 0.0006). Abbreviations: EBRT: external beam radiation therapy, OS: overall survival. (For interpretation of the references to colour in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the web version of this article.)

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Morris W.J., Tyldesley S., Rodda S. Androgen Suppression Combined with Elective Nodal and Dose Escalated Radiation Therapy (the ASCENDE-RT Trial): An Analysis of Survival Endpoints for a Randomized Trial Comparing a Low-Dose-Rate Brachytherapy Boost to a Dose-Escalated External Beam Boost for High- and Intermediate-risk Prostate Cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2017;98(2):275–285. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2016.11.026. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Wang Z., Ni Y., Chen J. The efficacy and safety of radical prostatectomy and radiotherapy in high-risk prostate cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis. World J Surg Oncol. 2020;18(1):42. doi: 10.1186/s12957-020-01824-9. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lai P.P., Pilepich M.v., Krall J.M. The effect of overall treatment time on the outcome of definitive radiotherapy for localized prostate carcinoma: The radiation therapy oncology group 75–06 and 77–06 experience. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1991;21(4):925–933. doi: 10.1016/0360-3016(91)90731-I. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Dong Y., Zaorsky N.G., Li T. Effects of interruptions of external beam radiation therapy on outcomes in patients with prostate cancer. J Med Imag Radiat Oncol. 2018;62(1):116–121. doi: 10.1111/1754-9485.12675. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Amdur R.J., Parsons J.T., Fitzgerald L.T., Million R.R. Adenocarcinoma of the prostate treated with external-beam radiation therapy: 5-year minimum follow-up. Radiother Oncol. 1990;18(3):235–246. doi: 10.1016/0167-8140(90)90059-6. - DOI - PubMed