Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2021 Jun;35(6):829-839.
doi: 10.1177/0269215520978859. Epub 2020 Dec 11.

Rehabilitation following rotator cuff repair: A multi-centre pilot & feasibility randomised controlled trial (RaCeR)

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Rehabilitation following rotator cuff repair: A multi-centre pilot & feasibility randomised controlled trial (RaCeR)

Chris Littlewood et al. Clin Rehabil. 2021 Jun.

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the feasibility of a multi-centre randomised controlled trial to compare the clinical and cost-effectiveness of early patient-directed rehabilitation versus standard rehabilitation following surgical repair of the rotator cuff of the shoulder.

Design: Two-arm, multi-centre pilot and feasibility randomised controlled trial.

Setting: Five National Health Service hospitals in England.

Participants: Adults (n = 73) with non-traumatic rotator cuff tears scheduled for repair were recruited and randomly allocated remotely prior to surgery.

Interventions: Early patient-directed rehabilitation (n = 37); advised to remove their sling as soon as able and move as symptoms allow. Standard rehabilitation (n = 36); sling immobilisation for four weeks.

Measures: (1) Randomisation of 20% or more eligible patients. (2) Difference in time out of sling of 40% or more between groups. (3) Follow-up greater than 70%.

Results: 73/185 (39%) potentially eligible patients were randomised. Twenty participants were withdrawn, 11 due to not receiving rotator cuff repair. The between-group difference in proportions of participants who exceeded the cut-off of 222.6 hours out of the sling was 50% (80% CI = 29%, 72%), with the early patient-directed rehabilitation group reporting greater time out of sling. 52/73 (71%) and 52/53 (98%) participants were followed-up at 12 weeks when withdrawals were included and excluded respectively. Eighteen full-thickness re-tears were reported (early patient-directed rehabilitation = 7, standard rehabilitation = 11). Five serious adverse events were reported.

Conclusion: A main randomised controlled trial is feasible but would require allocation of participants following surgery to counter the issue of withdrawal due to not receiving surgery.

Keywords: Rehabilitation interventions; physiotherapy; randomized controlled trial; shoulder pain.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of conflicting interests: The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
CONSORT flow diagram. *Missed early patient-directed rehabilitation intervention = 1; non-NHS surgery = 1; unwilling to return to main or affiliated NHS site for post-operative rehabilitation = 1.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Littlewood C, May S, Walters S. Epidemiology of rotator cuff tendinopathy: a systematic review. Shoulder Elb 2013; 5(4): 256–265.
    1. American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. Management of rotator cuff injuries clinical practice guideline, https://www.aaos.org/globalassets/quality-and-practice-resources/rotator... (2019, accessed March 11 2019). - PubMed
    1. Kulkarni R, Gibson J, Brownson P, et al.. BESS/BOA patient care pathways: subacromial shoulder pain. Shoulder Elb 2015; 7(2): 135–143. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Littlewood C, Bateman M, Clark D, et al.. Rehabilitation following rotator cuff repair: a systematic review. Shoulder Elb 2015; 7: 115–124. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Littlewood C, Bateman M. Rehabilitation following rotator cuff repair: a survey of current UK practice. Shoulder Elb 2015; 7: 193–204. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types