Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2020 Dec 1;3(12):e2027082.
doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.27082.

Effect of a Social Norm Email Feedback Program on the Unnecessary Prescription of Nimodipine in Ambulatory Care of Older Adults: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Effect of a Social Norm Email Feedback Program on the Unnecessary Prescription of Nimodipine in Ambulatory Care of Older Adults: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Fernando Torrente et al. JAMA Netw Open. .

Abstract

Importance: Nimodipine is a highly prescribed drug for the treatment of cognitive impairment and dementia in Argentina. There is little evidence to support the use of nimodipine for cognitive impairment and dementia.

Objective: To test the effectiveness of a behavioral intervention based on social norm feedback to reduce prescription of nimodipine for cognitive impairment in Argentina.

Design, setting, and participants: This pragmatic parallel-group randomized clinical trial included 2 arms with a 1:1 allocation ratio. General practitioner physicians in the national health care system for older adults in Argentina (INSSJP-PAMI) with history of high nimodipine prescription rate were enrolled. The study was conducted from May 2019 to October 2019, and data were analyzed from November 2019 to February 2020.

Interventions: The treatment group received 2 emails with evidence-based information about nimodipine plus the individual's level of nimodipine prescription compared with their peers. The control group received 2 emails with general information about the risks of overprescription in older adults.

Main outcomes and measures: The primary outcome was the cumulative number of nimodipine prescriptions per 1000 prescriptions of all drugs made by the targeted physicians during the 6 months of the study. Secondary outcomes included annual monetary savings attributable to the intervention and physicians' qualitative perceptions of the acceptability of the procedure.

Results: Of 1811 physicians enrolled, 906 physicians (354 [39.1%] women; mean [SD] age, 57.10 [10.73] years) were randomized to treatment and 905 participants (331 [36.6%] women; mean [SD] age, 56.49 [10.47] years) to the control group. Physicians in the treatment group wrote a mean of 93.25 (95% CI, 89.27 to 97.24) prescriptions of nimodipine, compared with 98.99 (95% CI, 95.00 to 102.98) prescriptions among practitioners in the control group during the half-year of the intervention (mean difference, -5.73 [95% CI, -11.38 to -0.10] prescriptions; P = .046), which meant a 5.79% reduction. Regression analysis revealed a significant association of the group condition with number of prescriptions per 1000 total prescriptions when controlling for baseline prescriptions (B = -0.312 [95% CI, -0.465 to -0.160]; P < .001). The observed difference corresponds to a 4.48% reduction in nimodipine prescriptions per 1000 prescriptions of all drugs made by physicians in the treated group compared with the control group. Physicians who effectively opened the email in the treatment group (427 physicians [47.1%]) prescribed the drug 11.3% less compared with the control group (426 physicians) (mean difference, -10.78 [95% CI, -18.53 to -3.03] prescriptions; P = .006). Expenditures were 7.18% lower in the treatment group, resulting in an estimated annual net cost benefit of US $234 893.35 (95% CI, $225 565.35 to $237 112.30).

Conclusions and relevance: In this randomized clinical trial, the social norm email feedback program showed an effect on curbing the nonrecommended prescription of nimodipine. It was highly cost-effective and well accepted by participants.

Trial registration: ISRCTN.org identifier: ISRCTN17823729.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest Disclosures: Dr Ricardo Mastai reported serving as Medical Technical General Secretary at the Instituto Nacional de Servicios Sociales para Jubilados y Pensionados. Dr Ajzenman reported personal fees from Inter-American Development Bank during the conduct of the study. No other disclosures were reported.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.. Flowchart of Study Recruitment
Figure 2.
Figure 2.. Effects of the Intervention on Primary Outcome

References

    1. Opondo D, Eslami S, Visscher S, et al. . Inappropriateness of medication prescriptions to elderly patients in the primary care setting: a systematic review. PLoS One. 2012;7(8):e43617. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0043617 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Thomsen LA, Winterstein AG, Søndergaard B, Haugbølle LS, Melander A. Systematic review of the incidence and characteristics of preventable adverse drug events in ambulatory care. Ann Pharmacother. 2007;41(9):1411-1426. doi:10.1345/aph.1H658 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Fu AZ, Jiang JZ, Reeves JH, Fincham JE, Liu GG, Perri M III. Potentially inappropriate medication use and healthcare expenditures in the US community-dwelling elderly. Med Care. 2007;45(5):472-476. doi:10.1097/01.mlr.0000254571.05722.34 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hyttinen V, Jyrkkä J, Valtonen H. A systematic review of the impact of potentially inappropriate medication on health care utilization and costs among older adults. Med Care. 2016;54(10):950-964. doi:10.1097/MLR.0000000000000587 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Stoehr GP, Jacobsen E, Jia Y, Snitz BE, Ganguli M. Trends in the use of medications and supplements to treat or prevent dementia: a population-based study. Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord. 2020;34(2):148-155. doi:10.1097/WAD.0000000000000357 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

Associated data